Suppr超能文献

患有广泛性侵袭性牙周炎的未经牙周治疗的墨西哥受试者的龈下微生物群。

Subgingival microbiota of periodontally untreated Mexican subjects with generalized aggressive periodontitis.

作者信息

Ximenez-Fyvie Laurie Ann, Almaguer-Flores Argelia, Jacobo-Soto Velia, Lara-Cordoba Monica, Moreno-Borjas Jazmin-Yunuen, Alcantara-Maruri Eulalio

机构信息

Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, School of Dentistry, National University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City 01760, Mexico.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2006 Dec;33(12):869-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01006.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Specific microbial profiles that may distinguish between generalized aggressive-periodontitis (GAgP) and generalized chronic-periodontitis (GCP) have, to date, not been described. The purpose of the present study was to describe the subgingival microbial composition of Mexican subjects with GAgP and compare it with that of individuals with GCP and periodontal health (PH).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-seven subjects with GAgP (n=19), GCP (n=39) and PH (n=19) were selected. Clinical measurements included plaque accumulation, gingival erythema, bleeding on probing, suppuration, pocket depth and attachment level. Up to 28 subgingival plaque samples were obtained from each subject and analysed using the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique.

RESULTS

GAgP and GCP subjects harboured significantly higher levels and/or proportion of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia (levels: p<0.001, proportion: p<0.01), Prevotella nigrescens (p<0.05 levels) and "red" complex species (p<0.001 proportion) than PH subjects. All GAgP subjects were carriers of P. gingivalis and P. nigrescens. No significant differences in any of the 40 microbial species tested were detected between GAgP and GCP subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed that the microbial differences between GAgP and GCP subjects were only discrete and none of the bacterial species tested seemed to specifically differentiate the subgingival microbial profile of either periodontitis group.

摘要

背景与目的

迄今为止,尚未有可区分广泛侵袭性牙周炎(GAgP)和广泛慢性牙周炎(GCP)的特定微生物谱被描述。本研究的目的是描述患有GAgP的墨西哥受试者的龈下微生物组成,并将其与患有GCP和牙周健康(PH)的个体的龈下微生物组成进行比较。

材料与方法

选取了77名患有GAgP(n = 19)、GCP(n = 39)和PH(n = 19)的受试者。临床测量包括菌斑积聚、牙龈红斑、探诊出血、化脓、牙周袋深度和附着水平。从每个受试者获取多达28个龈下菌斑样本,并使用棋盘式DNA-DNA杂交技术进行分析。

结果

与PH受试者相比,GAgP和GCP受试者的牙龈卟啉单胞菌、福赛坦氏菌(水平:p < 0.001,比例:p < 0.01)、变黑普氏菌(水平p < 0.05)和“红色”复合体菌属(比例p < 0.001)的水平和/或比例显著更高。所有GAgP受试者均为牙龈卟啉单胞菌和变黑普氏菌的携带者。在GAgP和GCP受试者之间,在所测试的40种微生物中未检测到任何显著差异。

结论

我们的结果显示,GAgP和GCP受试者之间的微生物差异仅为离散性的,并且所测试的细菌种类似乎均不能特异性区分任何一个牙周炎组的龈下微生物谱。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验