Harder S, Thürmann P, Siewert M, Blume H, Huber T, Rietbrock N
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Frankfurt/Main, F.R.G.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991 Feb;17(2):207-12. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199102000-00005.
The absolute bioavailability F and response (prolongation of the PR interval) of verapamil after single doses of the same oral formulation administered on two different days were investigated in 16 male subjects with an 80 mg fast dissolving and a 240 mg controlled-release preparation and compared with a bolus injection of 5 mg of verapamil. The absolute bioavailability was 23% in both investigations for the 80 mg preparation and 32% in both investigations for the 240 mg dosage form. The individual values obtained for tmax, cmax, F, and AUC0-alpha showed a wide intersubject variability; therefore, no significant differences could be observed between the two trials for each dosage, but significant differences existed between the investigations of the two preparations. After intravenous administration, concentration-effect curves were about twofold left shifted when compared with the 80 mg tablet and about threefold left shifted when compared with the 240 mg tablet. Estimation of the drug input rate showed significantly (p less than 0.05) smaller values when the controlled-release tablet was given (80 mg tablet: 95.1 and 107.7 mg/h; 240 mg tablet; 55.8 and 46.3 mg/h). Thus, the effect and bioavailability of verapamil show sufficient intersubject reproducibility if the same formulation is given. The differences between the responses and the bioavailability after administration of different preparations may be related as well to the drug absorption rate and the stereoselective first pass of verapamil as to saturation of first-pass metabolism.
在16名男性受试者中,使用80mg速溶制剂和240mg控释制剂,在两个不同日期给予单剂量相同口服制剂后,研究了维拉帕米的绝对生物利用度F和反应(PR间期延长),并与5mg维拉帕米的静脉推注进行比较。对于80mg制剂,两次研究中的绝对生物利用度均为23%;对于240mg剂型,两次研究中的绝对生物利用度均为32%。所获得的tmax、cmax、F和AUC0-α的个体值显示出受试者间的广泛变异性;因此,每种剂量的两次试验之间未观察到显著差异,但两种制剂的研究之间存在显著差异。静脉给药后,与80mg片剂相比,浓度-效应曲线向左移动约两倍,与240mg片剂相比,向左移动约三倍。药物输入速率的估计显示,给予控释片剂时,值显著更小(p小于0.05)(80mg片剂:95.1和107.7mg/h;240mg片剂:55.8和46.3mg/h)。因此,如果给予相同制剂,维拉帕米的效应和生物利用度显示出足够的受试者间重现性。不同制剂给药后反应和生物利用度之间的差异可能与药物吸收速率、维拉帕米的立体选择性首过效应以及首过代谢的饱和有关。