Halton Thomas L, Willett Walter C, Liu Simin, Manson JoAnn E, Albert Christine M, Rexrode Kathryn, Hu Frank B
Departments of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 9;355(19):1991-2002. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055317.
Low-carbohydrate diets have been advocated for weight loss and to prevent obesity, but the long-term safety of these diets has not been determined.
We evaluated data on 82,802 women in the Nurses' Health Study who had completed a validated food-frequency questionnaire. Data from the questionnaire were used to calculate a low-carbohydrate-diet score, which was based on the percentage of energy as carbohydrate, fat, and protein (a higher score reflects a higher intake of fat and protein and a lower intake of carbohydrate). The association between the low-carbohydrate-diet score and the risk of coronary heart disease was examined.
During 20 years of follow-up, we documented 1994 new cases of coronary heart disease. After multivariate adjustment, the relative risk of coronary heart disease comparing highest and lowest deciles of the low-carbohydrate-diet score was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.18; P for trend=0.19). The relative risk comparing highest and lowest deciles of a low-carbohydrate-diet score on the basis of the percentage of energy from carbohydrate, animal protein, and animal fat was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.19; P for trend=0.52), whereas the relative risk on the basis of the percentage of energy from intake of carbohydrates, vegetable protein, and vegetable fat was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.88; P for trend=0.002). A higher glycemic load was strongly associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (relative risk comparing highest and lowest deciles, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.15; P for trend=0.003).
Our findings suggest that diets lower in carbohydrate and higher in protein and fat are not associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease in women. When vegetable sources of fat and protein are chosen, these diets may moderately reduce the risk of coronary heart disease.
低碳水化合物饮食已被提倡用于减肥和预防肥胖,但这些饮食的长期安全性尚未确定。
我们评估了护士健康研究中82802名完成了经过验证的食物频率问卷的女性的数据。问卷数据用于计算低碳水化合物饮食评分,该评分基于碳水化合物、脂肪和蛋白质的能量百分比(得分越高反映脂肪和蛋白质摄入量越高,碳水化合物摄入量越低)。研究了低碳水化合物饮食评分与冠心病风险之间的关联。
在20年的随访期间,我们记录了1994例冠心病新病例。经过多变量调整后,比较低碳水化合物饮食评分最高和最低十分位数时冠心病的相对风险为0.94(95%置信区间[CI],0.76至1.18;趋势P值=0.19)。基于碳水化合物、动物蛋白和动物脂肪的能量百分比比较低碳水化合物饮食评分最高和最低十分位数时的相对风险为0.94(95%CI,0.74至1.19;趋势P值=0.52),而基于碳水化合物、植物蛋白和植物脂肪摄入量的能量百分比的相对风险为0.70(95%CI,0.56至0.88;趋势P值=0.002)。较高的血糖负荷与冠心病风险增加密切相关(比较最高和最低十分位数的相对风险,1.90;95%CI,1.15至3.15;趋势P值=0.003)。
我们的研究结果表明,碳水化合物含量较低、蛋白质和脂肪含量较高的饮食与女性冠心病风险增加无关。当选择植物来源的脂肪和蛋白质时,这些饮食可能会适度降低冠心病风险。