Koshiyama Masafumi, Kinezaki Masanori, Uchida Takafumi, Sumitomo Masahiro
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Organization Himeji Medical Center, Himeji, Hyogo, 670-8520, Japan.
Anticancer Res. 2006 Sep-Oct;26(5B):3655-9.
The tetrazolium dye (MTT) assay is useful in predicting chemosensitivity.
Using the MTT assay, an in vitro chemosensitivity test was designed for paclitaxel and docetaxel. The results were then compared with the sensitivity to carboplatin in 60 resected gynecological carcinomas.
The mean tumor inhibition rates [I.R.s; %] for paclitaxel, docetaxel and carboplatin were all higher in ovarian carcinomas than in endometrial carcinomas [74.3% vs. 47.3% (p < 0.01), 57.2% vs. 21.9% (p < 0.001), 71.3% vs. 50.1% (p < 0.01), respectively]. In 28 ovarian carcinomas, the I.R.s for paclitaxel and carboplatin were higher than docetaxel [74.3% and 71.3% vs. 57.2%, respectively (p < 0.05)]. In particular, the I.R. for paclitaxel was significantly higher than docetaxel [83.0% vs. 62.9% (p < 0.05)] in serous adenocarcinomas. In clear cell adenocarcinomas, however, both the I.R.s for paclitaxel and docetaxel were significantly lower than carboplatin [27.8% and 23.3% vs. 58.5%, respectively (p < 0.01)]. In 10 cervical carcinomas, the I.R. for docetaxel was significantly lower than paclitaxel and carboplatin [39.5% vs. 64.1% and 60.5%, respectively (p < 0.05)]. In 22 endometrial carcinomas, the I.R. for docetaxel was also lower than paclitaxel and carboplatin [21.9% vs. 47.4% and 50.1% (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively)]. Furthermore, the I.R. for docetaxel was significantly lower in G2 and G3 adenocarcinomas [16.9% vs. 45.8% and 52.8% (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, respectively)] [16.5% vs. 46.2% and 53.2% (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively)].
The antitumor activity of both paclitaxel and docetaxel was higher in ovarian carcinomas than in endometrial carcinomas. In ovarian carcinomas, however, paclitaxel and carboplatin were superior to docetaxel. In cervical and endometrial carcinomas, docetaxel was significantly worse than paclitaxel and carboplatin.
四氮唑蓝染料(MTT)法有助于预测化疗敏感性。
采用MTT法设计了针对紫杉醇和多西他赛的体外化疗敏感性试验。然后将结果与60例切除的妇科癌症对卡铂的敏感性进行比较。
卵巢癌中紫杉醇、多西他赛和卡铂的平均肿瘤抑制率[I.R.s;%]均高于子宫内膜癌[分别为74.3%对47.3%(p<0.01),57.2%对21.9%(p<0.001),71.3%对50.1%(p<0.01)]。在28例卵巢癌中,紫杉醇和卡铂的I.R.s高于多西他赛[分别为74.3%和71.3%对57.2%(p<0.05)]。特别是,浆液性腺癌中紫杉醇的I.R.显著高于多西他赛[83.0%对62.9%(p<0.05)]。然而,在透明细胞腺癌中,紫杉醇和多西他赛的I.R.s均显著低于卡铂[分别为27.8%和23.3%对58.5%(p<0.01)]。在10例宫颈癌中,多西他赛的I.R.显著低于紫杉醇和卡铂[分别为39.5%对64.1%和60.5%(p<0.05)]。在22例子宫内膜癌中,多西他赛的I.R.也低于紫杉醇和卡铂[21.9%对47.4%和50.1%(分别为p<0.01,p<0.001)]。此外[16.5%对46.2%和53.2%(分别为p<0.01,p<0.001)],G2和G3腺癌中多西他赛的I.R.显著更低[16.9%对45.8%和52.8%(分别为p<0.05,p<0.01)]。
卵巢癌中紫杉醇和多西他赛的抗肿瘤活性均高于子宫内膜癌。然而,在卵巢癌中,紫杉醇和卡铂优于多西他赛。在宫颈癌和子宫内膜癌中,多西他赛明显比紫杉醇和卡铂差。