Levin Brian M, Herrell S Duke
Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
J Endourol. 2006 Oct;20(10):808-12. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.808.
Historically, open pyeloplasty has been the gold-standard treatment for primary ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction, with success rates >90%. Over the past decade, laparoscopic pyeloplasty has emerged as a highly successful alternative for primary UPJ and secondary obstruction. For patients failing open pyeloplasty, endoscopic procedures such as antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy have been used as salvage therapies with success rates as high as 87.5%. Persistent obstruction after an initial open pyeloplasty and a subsequent unsuccessful salvage endoscopic procedure presents a difficult scenario, often necessitating complex and challenging repairs. We reviewed our experience with salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty as a reconstructive option for this difficult group of patients.
Between January 2002 and April 2005, 66 laparoscopic pyeloplasties were performed. Four patients, who had persistent obstruction after both open pyeloplasty and subsequent salvage endoscopic procedures, were the subject of this analysis. Operative time, length of stay (LOS), pain score resolution, and physiologic success rates were evaluated. Success was defined as resolution of obstruction on physiologic testing (renal scan).
The mean operative time was 310 minutes and the mean LOS 1.2 days. Three patients experienced resolution of obstruction by nuclear scan. The remaining patient, who has persistent obstruction but stable function on nuclear scan and resolution of pain, has refused evaluation with Whitaker testing. All patients have experienced at least 50% reduction of pain. Utilizing our strict physiologic criteria for success, including a diuretic T(1/2) of <10 minutes, a success rate of 75% was obtained.
Our series of laparoscopic reconstructions of the UPJ in patients failing both an initial open pyeloplasty and subsequent salvage endoscopic procedures is the largest in the literature at present. As in open surgery, the ability to respond to intraoperative findings with techniques such as flap repair and renal mobilization are essential. Although time consuming, these repairs can be successful and maintain the advantages of laparoscopy.
从历史上看,开放性肾盂成形术一直是原发性输尿管肾盂连接部(UPJ)梗阻的金标准治疗方法,成功率超过90%。在过去十年中,腹腔镜肾盂成形术已成为原发性UPJ和继发性梗阻的一种非常成功的替代方法。对于开放性肾盂成形术失败的患者,诸如顺行和逆行肾盂内切开术等内镜手术已被用作挽救性治疗,成功率高达87.5%。在初次开放性肾盂成形术以及随后的挽救性内镜手术失败后仍存在持续性梗阻,这是一种棘手的情况,通常需要进行复杂且具有挑战性的修复。我们回顾了我们对挽救性腹腔镜肾盂成形术作为这一困难患者群体的重建选择的经验。
在2002年1月至2005年4月期间,共进行了66例腹腔镜肾盂成形术。本分析的对象是4例在开放性肾盂成形术及随后的挽救性内镜手术后仍存在持续性梗阻的患者。对手术时间、住院时间(LOS)、疼痛评分缓解情况以及生理成功率进行了评估。成功定义为生理检查(肾扫描)显示梗阻解除。
平均手术时间为310分钟,平均住院时间为1.2天。3例患者经核素扫描显示梗阻解除。其余1例患者虽仍存在持续性梗阻,但核素扫描显示功能稳定且疼痛缓解,该患者拒绝进行惠特克试验评估。所有患者的疼痛均至少减轻了50%。按照我们严格的成功生理标准,包括利尿T(1/2)小于10分钟,成功率为75%。
我们对初次开放性肾盂成形术及随后的挽救性内镜手术均失败的患者进行腹腔镜UPJ重建的系列病例,是目前文献中报道数量最多的。与开放手术一样,运用诸如皮瓣修复和肾脏游离等技术应对术中发现的能力至关重要。尽管耗时,但这些修复手术可以成功,并保持腹腔镜手术的优势。