Mesoudi Alex, Whiten Andrew, Laland Kevin N
Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution and School of Psychology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9JP, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Behav Brain Sci. 2006 Aug;29(4):329-47; discussion 347-83. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X06009083.
We suggest that human culture exhibits key Darwinian evolutionary properties, and argue that the structure of a science of cultural evolution should share fundamental features with the structure of the science of biological evolution. This latter claim is tested by outlining the methods and approaches employed by the principal subdisciplines of evolutionary biology and assessing whether there is an existing or potential corresponding approach to the study of cultural evolution. Existing approaches within anthropology and archaeology demonstrate a good match with the macroevolutionary methods of systematics, paleobiology, and biogeography, whereas mathematical models derived from population genetics have been successfully developed to study cultural microevolution. Much potential exists for experimental simulations and field studies of cultural microevolution, where there are opportunities to borrow further methods and hypotheses from biology. Potential also exists for the cultural equivalent of molecular genetics in "social cognitive neuroscience," although many fundamental issues have yet to be resolved. It is argued that studying culture within a unifying evolutionary framework has the potential to integrate a number of separate disciplines within the social sciences.
我们认为人类文化展现出关键的达尔文式进化特性,并主张文化进化科学的结构应与生物进化科学的结构共享基本特征。通过概述进化生物学主要子学科所采用的方法和途径,并评估是否存在现有的或潜在的相应文化进化研究方法,对后一种主张进行了检验。人类学和考古学中的现有方法与系统学、古生物学和生物地理学的宏观进化方法表现出良好的匹配,而源自群体遗传学的数学模型已成功用于研究文化微观进化。文化微观进化的实验模拟和实地研究有很大潜力,在这方面有机会从生物学中借鉴更多方法和假设。“社会认知神经科学”中也存在文化层面分子遗传学的潜力,尽管许多基本问题尚未得到解决。有人认为,在统一的进化框架内研究文化有可能整合社会科学中的一些独立学科。