Liu Tong Ming, Martina Monique, Hutmacher Dietmar W, Hui James Hoi Po, Lee Eng Hin, Lim Bing
Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672.
Stem Cells. 2007 Mar;25(3):750-60. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0394. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
Mesenchymal stem cells derived from human bone marrow (hBMSCs) and human adipose tissue (hAMSCs) represent a useful source of progenitor cells for cell therapy and tissue engineering. However, it is not clear what the similarities and differences between them are. Like hBMSCs, hAMSCs can differentiate into osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic cells. Whether MSCs derived from different tissue sources represent fundamentally similar or different cell types is not clear. Given the possible different sources of MSCs for cell therapy, a comprehensive comparison of the different MSCs would be very useful. Here, we compared the transcriptome profile of hAMCS and hBMSCs during directed differentiation into bone, cartilage, and fat. Our data revealed considerable similarities between bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMSCs) and adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AMSCs). We uncovered an interesting bifurcation of pathways in both BMSCs and AMSCs, in which osteogenesis and adipogenesis appear to be linked in a differentiation branch separate from chondrogenesis. Our data suggest that although a set of common genes may be needed for early differentiation into all three lineages, a different set of signature genes is associated with maturation into fully differentiated cells. The recruitment of different late differentiation factors explains and supports our conclusion that BMSCs differentiate more efficiently into bone and cartilage, whereas AMSCs differentiate better into adipocytes. This study not only generated a rich database for continuing molecular characterization of various MSCs but also provided a rational basis for assessing qualities of MSCs from different sources for the purpose of cell-based therapy and tissue engineering.
源自人骨髓(hBMSCs)和人脂肪组织(hAMSCs)的间充质干细胞是细胞治疗和组织工程中祖细胞的有用来源。然而,它们之间的异同尚不清楚。与hBMSCs一样,hAMSCs可以分化为成骨细胞、脂肪细胞和软骨细胞。源自不同组织来源的间充质干细胞是代表基本相似还是不同的细胞类型尚不清楚。鉴于细胞治疗中间充质干细胞可能有不同来源,对不同间充质干细胞进行全面比较将非常有用。在此,我们比较了hAMCS和hBMSCs在定向分化为骨、软骨和脂肪过程中的转录组概况。我们的数据揭示了骨髓来源的间充质干细胞(BMSCs)和脂肪组织来源的间充质干细胞(AMSCs)之间存在相当多的相似之处。我们在BMSCs和AMSCs中都发现了一个有趣的途径分支,其中成骨和成脂似乎在与软骨形成分开的一个分化分支中相关联。我们的数据表明,虽然早期分化为所有三个谱系可能需要一组共同基因,但一组不同的特征基因与成熟为完全分化的细胞相关。不同晚期分化因子的募集解释并支持了我们的结论,即BMSCs更有效地分化为骨和软骨,而AMSCs更好地分化为脂肪细胞。这项研究不仅为继续对各种间充质干细胞进行分子表征生成了丰富的数据库,还为评估不同来源间充质干细胞用于基于细胞的治疗和组织工程的质量提供了合理依据。