Ramunni Alfonso, Brescia Paola, Ranieri Giuseppe, Ria Roberto, Coratelli Pasquate
Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal and Public Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Ther Apher Dial. 2006 Oct;10(5):463-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2006.00394.x.
During hemodialysis, ultrafiltration (UF) seems to affect the dialytic dose because of convective removal of urea and contraction of its distribution volume. We aimed to assess whether the adoption of a decreasing UF profile could yield a different dialytic dose from that obtained with a constant UF mode. Ten patients were randomly assigned to undergo 12 sessions with a constant UF mode (phase A) followed by 12 sessions with a decreasing UF rate (phase B), or the reverse. Kt/V and urea reduction ratio (URR) were 1.77 +/- 0.26 and 70.02 +/- 8.26% in phase A vs. 1.81 +/- 0.36 and 71.02 +/- 6.48% in phase B, respectively, showing no significant difference. Measurement of the differences in volemic variations between the two phases showed a statistically significant difference at the second hour (P < 0.001, the volemic reduction being greater in phase B than A) and at the fourth hour (P < 0.001, being greater in phase A than B). In standard bicarbonate dialysis, the adoption of a decreasing UF profile rather than a constant one does not alter the efficiency of the dialytic treatment.
在血液透析过程中,由于尿素的对流清除及其分布容积的收缩,超滤(UF)似乎会影响透析剂量。我们旨在评估采用递减超滤模式是否会产生与恒定超滤模式不同的透析剂量。10名患者被随机分配,先进行12次恒定超滤模式的治疗(A阶段),然后进行12次超滤率递减的治疗(B阶段),或者顺序相反。A阶段的Kt/V和尿素清除率(URR)分别为1.77±0.26和70.02±8.26%,而B阶段分别为1.81±0.36和71.02±6.48%,差异无统计学意义。对两个阶段血容量变化差异的测量显示,在第二小时(P<0.001,B阶段的血容量减少大于A阶段)和第四小时(P<0.001,A阶段大于B阶段)有统计学显著差异。在标准碳酸氢盐透析中,采用递减超滤模式而非恒定超滤模式不会改变透析治疗的效率。