Vickers David, Ross Allen G, Mainar-Jaime Raúl C, Neudorf Cordell, Shah Syed
Department of Applied Research, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.
CMAJ. 2006 Nov 7;175(10):1213-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051637.
The transition from a whole-cell to a 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine provided a unique opportunity to compare the effect that each type of vaccine had on the incidence of pertussis, under routine conditions, among children less than 10 years of age.
Analyses were based on passive surveillance data collected between 1995 and 2005. The incidence of pertussis by year and birth cohort was compiled according to age during the surveillance period. We determined the association between vaccine type (whole-cell, acellular or a combination of both) and the incidence of pertussis using Poisson regression analysis after controlling for age (< 1 year, 1-4 years and 5-9 years) and vaccination history (i.e., partial or complete).
During 7 of the 11 years surveyed, infants (< 1 year of age) had the highest incidence of pertussis. Among children born after 1997, when acellular vaccines were introduced, the rates of pertussis were highest among infants and preschool children (1-4 years of age). Poisson regression analysis revealed that, in the group given either the whole-cell vaccine or a combination of both vaccines, the incidence of pertussis was lower among infants and preschool children than among school-aged children (5-9 years). The reverse was true in the group given only an acellular vaccine, with a higher incidence among infants and preschool children than among school-aged children.
These results suggest that current immunization practices may not be adequate in protecting infants and children less than 5 years of age against pertussis. Altering available acellular formulations or adopting immunization practices used in some European countries may increase the clinical effectiveness of routine pertussis vaccination programs among infants and preschool children.
从全细胞百日咳疫苗过渡到五组分无细胞百日咳疫苗,提供了一个独特的机会,可在常规条件下比较每种疫苗对10岁以下儿童百日咳发病率的影响。
分析基于1995年至2005年收集的被动监测数据。根据监测期间的年龄,按年份和出生队列编制百日咳发病率。在控制年龄(<1岁、1 - 4岁和5 - 9岁)和疫苗接种史(即部分或全程接种)后,我们使用泊松回归分析确定疫苗类型(全细胞、无细胞或两者组合)与百日咳发病率之间的关联。
在调查的11年中的7年里,婴儿(<1岁)百日咳发病率最高。在1997年引入无细胞疫苗后出生的儿童中,百日咳发病率在婴儿和学龄前儿童(1 - 4岁)中最高。泊松回归分析显示,在接种全细胞疫苗或两种疫苗组合的组中,婴儿和学龄前儿童的百日咳发病率低于学龄儿童(5 - 9岁)。在仅接种无细胞疫苗的组中情况相反,婴儿和学龄前儿童的发病率高于学龄儿童。
这些结果表明,当前的免疫接种做法可能不足以保护5岁以下的婴儿和儿童免受百日咳侵害。改变现有的无细胞制剂配方或采用一些欧洲国家使用的免疫接种做法,可能会提高常规百日咳疫苗接种计划对婴儿和学龄前儿童的临床效果。