Slow pathway ablation decreases vulnerability to pacing-induced atrial fibrillation: Possible role of vagal denervation.

BACKGROUND

Studies indicate that success of radiofrequency (RF) ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) may be in part due to vagal denervation. RFAof supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) has been associated with vagal denervation. The effects of slow pathway (SP) ablation on AF inducibility have not been studied.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that SP ablation renders AF less inducible.

METHODS

Consecutive patients referred for SVT were studied. After atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) was confirmed they underwent induction of AF. After SP ablation AF induction was reattempted. Vulnerability to AF was reassessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled; eight were not inducible for AF in the preablative state. Mean CLof the AVNRT was 340 +/- 16 ms. The average RF ablation time was 131 +/- 42 seconds. Presence of junctional rhythm was required. Of the 16 with inducible AF two patients had AF induced during routine invasive electrophysiology study. None of these had inducible AF after SP ablation. Fourteen of 16 patients required specific AF induction. Ten of these were noninducible after SP ablation; two were inducible after SP ablation but with a more aggressive pacing protocol (P < 0.03 compared to preablation) and two had no change in AF vulnerability. Seven of the eight noninducible patients remained noninducible for AF post SP ablation. In the 12 patients who were inducible prior but noninducible after ablation the mean atrial effective refractory period (AERP) increased for both BCL at 400 and 600 ms (400/216 +/- 8 ms preablation vs 400/248 +/- 12 ms postablation, P < 0.03; 600/228 +/- 8 ms preablation vs 600/259 +/- 6 ms postablation, P < 0.04). There were no significant changes in AERP of patients who remained inducible or who were noninducible before ablation. The average ablation time for patients who became noninducible after ablation was significantly higher than those who had no change in inducibility or remained inducible but at a more aggressive pacing threshold (157 +/- 24 seconds vs 35 +/- 5 seconds; P < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

SP ablation acutely decreases vulnerability to pacing-induced AF in patients with AVNRT. This may reflect the effect of ablation on atrial vagal tone.