Körner Hartwig, Söreide Kjetil, Stokkeland Pål Johan, Söreide Jon Arne
Department of Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, P.O. Box 8100, 4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):417-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9060-6.
Serial measurements of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are frequently used in the follow-up after colorectal cancer (CRC), but its usefulness remains debatable. Choosing the appropriate cut-off point is crucial to the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of continuous test variables. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis is the appropriate statistical method for this purpose, but has not been applied in previous studies.
One hundred ninety-four consecutive patients surgically treated with curative intent for CRC between July 1996 and June 1999 had systematic follow-up for five years. Follow-up included imaging, coloscopy and serial CEA measurements. Complete data including CEA measurements were available from 153 patients. ROC analysis of CEA was done with regard to detection of recurrent disease.
Depending on the chosen cut-off value of CEA, DA varied widely within the normal range (CEA <or=10 U/ml). CEA >4 U/ml provided the highest sensitivity (0.78) and specificity (0.91), compared to a sensitivity and specificity at the upper normal range (CEA = 10 U/ml) of 0.51 and 0.99, respectively. Thirty-three patients (24%) developed recurrence. Among 11 (5%) asymptomatic patients diagnosed by elevated CEA levels, only two patients (1.5%) were amenable to secondary curative surgery. A threefold increase of CEA in an individual patient had the same DA as the best cut-off value (>4 U/ml).
Diagnostic accuracy of CEA in follow-up after curative surgery for CRC is influenced by the chosen cut-off value. A threefold increase of CEA may indicate recurrent disease. The value of serial measurement of CEA was limited.
癌胚抗原(CEA)的系列检测常用于结直肠癌(CRC)术后的随访,但其实用性仍存在争议。选择合适的临界值对于连续检测变量的诊断准确性(DA)至关重要。受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析是适用于此目的的统计学方法,但以往研究尚未应用。
1996年7月至1999年6月期间,194例接受根治性手术治疗的CRC患者接受了为期五年的系统随访。随访包括影像学检查、结肠镜检查和CEA系列检测。153例患者可获得包括CEA检测在内的完整数据。对CEA进行ROC分析以检测复发疾病。
根据所选的CEA临界值,在正常范围内(CEA≤10 U/ml),DA差异很大。与正常范围上限(CEA = 10 U/ml)时的灵敏度0.51和特异性0.99相比,CEA>4 U/ml时灵敏度最高(0.78),特异性最高(0.91)。33例患者(24%)出现复发。在11例(5%)因CEA水平升高而诊断出的无症状患者中,只有2例患者(1.5%)适合二次根治性手术。个体患者CEA升高三倍与最佳临界值(>4 U/ml)具有相同的DA。
CRC根治性手术后随访中CEA的诊断准确性受所选临界值的影响。CEA升高三倍可能提示疾病复发。CEA系列检测的价值有限。