Suppr超能文献

裸金属支架和西罗莫司洗脱支架的死亡原因。

Cause of death with bare metal and sirolimus-eluting stents.

作者信息

Holmes David R, Moses Jeffrey W, Schofer Joachim, Morice Marie-Claude, Schampaert Erick, Leon Martin B

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2006 Dec;27(23):2815-22. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl385. Epub 2006 Nov 15.

Abstract

AIMS

Although drug-eluting stents have assumed a dominant role in interventional cardiology, concern has been raised about the potential for long-term adverse outcomes, including death. The aim of the present study was to compare the incidence and cause of death between patients who received sirolimus-eluting or bare metal stents.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An integrated analysis was performed on 1748 patients enrolled in four prospective double-blind trials that randomly assigned patients to receive either a sirolimus-eluting or a bare metal stent for treatment of a single de novo coronary stenosis. During a mean follow-up of 2.6+/-0.6 years, 64 patients (3.7%) died. Total mortality was 3.2% among 870 bare metal stent patients and 4.1% among 878 sirolimus-eluting stent patients (P=0.37); there was no difference in cardiac mortality (1.4 vs. 1.3%; P=0.55) or causes of death between these two groups. The predominant cause of death was non-cardiac. Cardiac death was most frequently assigned owing to unwitnessed death. Death due to acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and stent thrombosis occurred infrequently.

CONCLUSION

At a mean follow-up of 2.6 years in percutaneous coronary intervention patients, the predominant cause of death was non-cardiac. There was no significant difference in either the frequency or the cause of death with implantation of either sirolimus-eluting or bare metal stents.

摘要

目的

尽管药物洗脱支架在介入心脏病学中已占据主导地位,但人们对包括死亡在内的长期不良后果的可能性表示担忧。本研究的目的是比较接受西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架的患者之间的死亡发生率和原因。

方法与结果

对1748例参加四项前瞻性双盲试验的患者进行了综合分析,这些试验将患者随机分配接受西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架以治疗单一原发性冠状动脉狭窄。在平均2.6±0.6年的随访期间,64例患者(3.7%)死亡。870例裸金属支架患者的总死亡率为3.2%,878例西罗莫司洗脱支架患者的总死亡率为4.1%(P=0.37);两组之间的心脏死亡率(1.4%对1.3%;P=0.55)或死亡原因没有差异。主要死亡原因是非心脏性的。心脏死亡最常见的原因是未目睹的死亡。急性心肌梗死、充血性心力衰竭和支架血栓形成导致的死亡很少发生。

结论

在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者平均随访2.6年时,主要死亡原因是非心脏性的。植入西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架的患者在死亡频率或原因方面均无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验