Gravelle Hugh, Dusheiko Mark, Sheaff Rod, Sargent Penny, Boaden Ruth, Pickard Susan, Parker Stuart, Roland Martin
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO10 5DD.
BMJ. 2007 Jan 6;334(7583):31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39020.413310.55. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
To determine the impact on outcomes in patients of the Evercare approach to case management of elderly people.
Practice level before and after analysis of hospital admissions data with control group.
Nine primary care trusts in England that, in 2003-5, piloted case management of elderly people selected as being at high risk of emergency admission.
Rates of emergency admission, emergency bed days, and mortality from April 2001 to March 2005 in 62 Evercare practices and 6960-7695 control practices in England (depending on the analysis being carried out).
The intervention had no significant effect on rates of emergency admission (increase 16.5%, (95% confidence interval -5.7% to 38.7%), emergency bed days (increase 19.0%, -5.3% to 43.2%), and mortality (increase 34.4%, -1.7% to 70.3%) for a high risk population aged >65 with a history of two or more emergency admissions in the preceding 13 months. For the general population aged > or =65 effects on the rates of emergency admission (increase 2.5%, -2.1% to 7.0%), emergency bed days (decrease -4.9%, -10.8% to 1.0%), and mortality (increase 5.5%, -3.5% to 14.5%) were also non-significant.
Case management of frail elderly people introduced an additional range of services into primary care without an associated reduction in hospital admissions. This may have been because of identification of additional cases. Employment of community matrons is now a key feature of case management policy in the NHS in England. Without more radical system redesign this policy is unlikely to reduce hospital admissions.
确定“关爱一生”老年病例管理方法对患者治疗结果的影响。
采用对照组,对医院入院数据进行前后分析的实践水平研究。
英格兰的9个初级医疗信托机构,在2003年至2005年期间,对被选为紧急入院高风险人群的老年人进行病例管理试点。
2001年4月至2005年3月期间,英格兰62个“关爱一生”实践机构和6960 - 7695个对照机构(取决于所进行的分析)的紧急入院率、紧急住院天数和死亡率。
对于年龄>65岁、在过去13个月内有两次或更多次紧急入院史的高风险人群,干预措施对紧急入院率(增加16.5%,95%置信区间为-5.7%至38.7%)、紧急住院天数(增加19.0%,-5.3%至43.2%)和死亡率(增加34.4%,-1.7%至70.3%)均无显著影响。对于年龄≥65岁的普通人群,干预措施对紧急入院率(增加2.5%,-2.1%至7.0%)、紧急住院天数(减少-4.9%,-10.8%至1.0%)和死亡率(增加5.5%,-3.5%至14.5%)的影响也不显著。
体弱老年人的病例管理在初级医疗中引入了一系列额外服务,但并未相应减少住院人数。这可能是因为识别出了更多病例。社区护士长的聘用现在是英格兰国民医疗服务体系病例管理政策的一个关键特征。如果没有更彻底的系统重新设计,这项政策不太可能减少住院人数。