• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理持续高需求的紧急救护车呼叫者的策略:使用关联数据进行评估(STRETCHED) - 研究方案。

STRategies to manage Emergency ambulance Telephone Callers with sustained High needs: an Evaluation using linked Data (STRETCHED) - a study protocol.

机构信息

Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK

Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 29;12(3):e053123. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053123.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053123
PMID:35351702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8966558/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

UK ambulance services have identified a concern with high users of the 999 service and have set up 'frequent callers' services, ranging from within-service management to cross-sectoral multidisciplinary case management approaches. There is little evidence about how to address the needs of this patient group.

AIM

To evaluate effectiveness, safety and efficiency of case management approaches to the care of people who frequently call the emergency ambulance service, and gain an understanding of barriers and facilitators to implementation.

OBJECTIVES

(1) Develop an understanding of predicted mechanisms of change to underpin evaluation. (2) Describe epidemiology of sustained high users of 999 services. (3) Evaluate case management approaches to the care of people who call the 999 ambulance service frequently in terms of: (i) Further emergency contacts (999, emergency department, emergency admissions to hospital) (ii) Effects on other services (iii) Adverse events (deaths, injuries, serious medical emergencies and police arrests) (iv) Costs of intervention and care (v) Patient experience of care. (4) Identify challenges and opportunities associated with using case management models, including features associated with success, and develop theories about how case management works in this population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a multisite mixed-methods evaluation of case management for people who use ambulance services frequently by using anonymised linked routine data outcomes in a 'natural experiment' cohort design, in four regional ambulance services. We will conduct interviews and focus groups with service users, commissioners and emergency and non-acute care providers. The planned start and end dates of the study are 1 April 2019 and 1 September 2022, respectively ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study received approval from the UK Health Research Authority (Confidentiality Advisory Group reference number: 19/CAG/0195; research ethics committee reference number: 19/WA/0216).We will collate feedback from our Lived Experience Advisory Panel, the Frequent Caller National Network and Research Management Group for targeted dissemination activities.

摘要

介绍

英国的救护车服务机构已经注意到,999 服务的高频用户数量过多,并设立了“高频呼叫者”服务,服务范围从内部服务管理到跨部门多学科病例管理方法。目前几乎没有关于如何满足这一患者群体需求的证据。

目的

评估针对频繁拨打紧急救护车服务的患者的病例管理方法的有效性、安全性和效率,并了解实施过程中的障碍和促进因素。

目标

(1)了解支持评估的预测机制变化。(2)描述持续大量使用 999 服务的患者的流行病学特征。(3)评估针对高频拨打 999 救护车服务的患者的病例管理方法,具体包括:(i)进一步的紧急联系(999、急诊部、急诊入院);(ii)对其他服务的影响;(iii)不良事件(死亡、伤害、严重医疗紧急情况和警察逮捕);(iv)干预和护理成本;(v)患者对护理的体验。(4)识别与使用病例管理模式相关的挑战和机遇,包括与成功相关的特征,并制定关于病例管理在该人群中如何运作的理论。

方法和分析

我们将通过在四个地区的救护车服务中使用匿名链接的常规数据结果,在“自然实验”队列设计中,对高频使用救护车服务的患者进行多站点混合方法评估。我们将对服务使用者、专员以及紧急和非急性护理提供者进行访谈和焦点小组讨论。该研究的计划开始和结束日期分别为 2019 年 4 月 1 日和 2022 年 9 月 1 日。

伦理与传播

该研究获得了英国健康研究局的批准(保密性咨询小组编号:19/CAG/0195;研究伦理委员会编号:19/WA/0216)。我们将汇总来自我们的生活体验咨询小组、高频呼叫者国家网络和研究管理小组的反馈,以便进行有针对性的传播活动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44e/8966558/0a62ec1b7335/bmjopen-2021-053123f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44e/8966558/5a5bf22d8be1/bmjopen-2021-053123f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44e/8966558/0a62ec1b7335/bmjopen-2021-053123f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44e/8966558/5a5bf22d8be1/bmjopen-2021-053123f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44e/8966558/0a62ec1b7335/bmjopen-2021-053123f02.jpg

相似文献

1
STRategies to manage Emergency ambulance Telephone Callers with sustained High needs: an Evaluation using linked Data (STRETCHED) - a study protocol.管理持续高需求的紧急救护车呼叫者的策略:使用关联数据进行评估(STRETCHED) - 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 29;12(3):e053123. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053123.
2
Experiences and views of people who frequently call emergency ambulance services: A qualitative study of UK service users.经常拨打紧急救护车服务的人的经验和观点:英国服务使用者的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13856. doi: 10.1111/hex.13856. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
3
What are emergency ambulance services doing to meet the needs of people who call frequently? A national survey of current practice in the United Kingdom.紧急救护车服务部门正在采取什么措施来满足频繁呼叫者的需求?英国当前实践的全国性调查。
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Dec 28;19(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0297-3.
4
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.确定照护模式以改善有紧急照护需求的老年人的结局:一种开发系统动力学模型的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104.
5
Community First Responders' role in the current and future rural health and care workforce: a mixed-methods study.社区第一响应者在当前和未来农村卫生和保健劳动力中的作用:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(18):1-101. doi: 10.3310/JYRT8674.
6
7
Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients.“非重症”紧急救护服务患者电话咨询的安全性
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):363-73. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.363.
8
Home or hospital for people with dementia and one or more other multimorbidities: What is the potential to reduce avoidable emergency admissions? The HOMEWARD Project Protocol.痴呆症和一种或多种其他多种疾病患者的家庭或医院:减少可避免急诊入院的潜力有多大?HOMEWARD 项目方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 3;7(4):e016651. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016651.
9
Building an understanding of Ethnic minority people's Service Use Relating to Emergency care for injuries: the BE SURE study protocol.建立对少数民族人群与伤害急诊服务利用的理解:BE SURE 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 25;13(4):e069596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069596.
10
Frequent callers to UK ambulance services in the COVID-19 pandemic: managing mental health, social isolation and loneliness.新冠疫情期间英国救护车服务的频繁呼叫者:应对心理健康、社会隔离和孤独感
Br Paramed J. 2021 Sep 1;6(2):66-75. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2021.09.6.2.66.

引用本文的文献

1
'If It Was Easy Somebody Would Have Fixed It': An Exploration of Loneliness and Social Isolation Amongst People Who Frequently Call Ambulance Services.“如果这很容易,那么早就有人解决了”:频繁拨打急救服务电话的人群中孤独和社会隔离现象的探索。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14167. doi: 10.1111/hex.14167.
2
Managing High Frequency of Ambulance Calls in Hospitals: A Systematic Review.医院中救护车呼叫高频情况的管理:一项系统综述
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Feb 1;17:287-296. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S436265. eCollection 2024.
3
Defining a threshold above which an adult can be considered to frequently use ambulance services: a retrospective cross-sectional study of emergency calls to an ambulance service in England.

本文引用的文献

1
A Profile of the SAIL Databank on the UK Secure Research Platform.英国安全研究平台上的SAIL数据库简介。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2019 Nov 20;4(2):1134. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i2.1134.
2
'All hands-on deck', working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research.“全员出动”,共同制定英国公众参与研究的标准。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Sep 16;6:53. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00229-y. eCollection 2020.
3
Drivers of Increasing Emergency Ambulance Demand.急诊救护车需求增加的驱动因素。
确定一个阈值,超过该阈值的成年人可被视为经常使用救护车服务:对英格兰一家救护车服务机构的紧急呼叫进行的回顾性横断面研究。
Br Paramed J. 2023 Mar 1;7(4):35-45. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2023.3.7.4.35.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 May-Jun;24(3):385. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1635670. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
4
Social factors in frequent callers: a description of isolation, poverty and quality of life in those calling emergency medical services frequently.频繁呼叫者的社会因素:对频繁呼叫急救医疗服务者的隔离、贫困和生活质量的描述。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6964-1.
5
Understanding Why Frequent Users of EMS Call 9-1-1: A Grounded Theory Study.理解为何急救医疗服务频繁使用者拨打911:一项扎根理论研究
Health Promot Pract. 2020 May;21(3):440-447. doi: 10.1177/1524839918799504. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
6
Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials.理解与误解随机对照试验。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:2-21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 25.
7
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453.
8
Mortality, admission rates and outpatient use among frequent users of emergency departments: a systematic review.急诊科频繁使用者的死亡率、住院率和门诊使用率:一项系统综述。
Emerg Med J. 2016 Mar;33(3):230-6. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204496. Epub 2015 May 7.
9
Frequent callers to the ambulance service: patient profiling and impact of case management on patient utilisation of the ambulance service.救护车服务的频繁呼叫者:患者特征分析及病例管理对救护车服务患者利用率的影响。
Emerg Med J. 2015 May;32(5):392-6. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203496. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
10
Involving service users in trials: developing a standard operating procedure.将服务使用者纳入试验中:制定标准操作规程。
Trials. 2013 Jul 17;14:219. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-219.