McVaugh Michael
Department of History, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3195, USA.
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2007 Apr;62(2):125-40. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jrl046. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
The case histories used to illustrate Richard Wiseman's Several Chirurgicall Treatises (1676) reveal not only pathological and therapeutic detail but much information about the range of occupational relationships between Wiseman and the many London physicians with whom he collaborated on cases (more than forty are identified in an appendix to this article). His interaction with the two physicians with whom he had most to do, Francis Prujean and Walter Needham, exemplifies the extremes of such relationships. With Prujean, an older man and a leading figure in the College of Physicians, a formal and hierarchical relationship was observed, in which distinct occupational lines were maintained. In the case of Needham, a younger physician whose devotion to anatomical study was shared by Wiseman, a friendship developed between the two men that carried over into practice and tended to break down occupational and intellectual distinctions, so that Needham sometimes involved himself in Wiseman's surgical practice, and Wiseman initiated medical research later reported by Needham to the Royal Society.
用于阐释理查德·怀斯曼的《外科学论文集》(1676年)的病例记录不仅揭示了病理和治疗细节,还提供了大量关于怀斯曼与众多伦敦医生之间职业关系范围的信息,他曾与这些医生在病例上展开合作(本文附录中确认了四十多位)。他与合作最多的两位医生弗朗西斯·普鲁让和沃尔特·尼德姆的互动,体现了这种关系的两个极端。与普鲁让这位年长者且是医师学院的领军人物,维持着一种正式且等级分明的关系,其中不同的职业界限得以保持。而对于尼德姆这位年轻医生,怀斯曼与他一样热衷于解剖学研究,两人之间发展出了友谊,这种友谊延伸到了实际工作中,并且往往模糊了职业和知识上的差异,以至于尼德姆有时会参与怀斯曼的外科手术,而怀斯曼开展的医学研究后来由尼德姆报告给了皇家学会。