Schackman Bruce R, Merrill Joseph O, McCarty Dennis, Levi Jeffrey, Lubinski Christine
Department of Public Health, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Dec 15;43 Suppl 4:S247-53. doi: 10.1086/508190.
Treatment for substance abuse and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection historically have come from different providers, often in separate locations, and have been reimbursed through separate funding streams. We describe policy and financing challenges faced by health care providers seeking to integrate buprenorphine, a new treatment for opioid dependence, into HIV primary care. Regulatory challenges include licensing and training restrictions imposed by the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 and confidentiality regulations for alcohol and drug treatment records. Potential responses include the development of local training programs and electronic medical records. Addressing the complexity of funding sources for integrated care will require administrative support, up-front investments, and federal and state leadership. A policy and financing research agenda should address evidence gaps in the rationales for regulatory restrictions and should include cost-effectiveness studies that quantify the "value for money" of investments in integrated care to improve health outcomes for HIV-infected patients with opioid dependence.
历史上,药物滥用治疗和人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染治疗由不同的提供者负责,通常地点也不同,且通过不同的资金流进行报销。我们描述了医疗保健提供者在试图将丁丙诺啡(一种治疗阿片类药物依赖的新疗法)纳入HIV初级保健时所面临的政策和融资挑战。监管挑战包括2000年《药物成瘾治疗法》规定的许可和培训限制以及酒精和药物治疗记录的保密规定。可能的应对措施包括制定当地培训计划和电子病历。应对综合护理资金来源的复杂性需要行政支持、前期投资以及联邦和州层面的领导。政策和融资研究议程应解决监管限制理由方面的证据空白,还应包括成本效益研究,以量化对综合护理投资的“性价比”,从而改善阿片类药物依赖的HIV感染患者的健康结局。