Suppr超能文献

部分儿科诊所应对儿童危急情况的准备情况。

Preparedness of selected pediatric offices to respond to critical emergencies in children.

作者信息

Santillanes Genevieve, Gausche-Hill Marianne, Sosa Bernardo

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90509, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Nov;22(11):694-8. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000238744.73735.0e.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the preparedness of pediatric offices that had activated emergency medical services (EMS) for a critically ill child requiring airway management.

METHODS

Fifteen patients who initially presented to pediatric or family practice offices but required EMS activation and cardiac and/or respiratory support were identified from a previous prospective study of airway management in children. Two to 4 years after the emergency requiring EMS activation, the offices were contacted to complete a written survey about office preparedness for pediatric emergencies.

RESULTS

Eight of 15 offices (53%) returned a survey. Pediatricians staffed all responding offices, and all offices were within 5 miles of an emergency department. Airway emergencies were the most common emergencies seen in the offices. Availability of emergency equipment and medications varied. All offices stocked albuterol, and most (7/8) had an oxygen source with a flowmeter. However, only half of the offices had a fast-acting anticonvulsant, and a quarter had no anticonvulsant. Three offices lacked bag-mask (manual) resuscitators with all appropriate sized masks, and 3 offices lacked suction. The most common reasons cited for not stocking all emergency equipment and drugs were quick response time of EMS and proximity to an emergency department.

CONCLUSIONS

Even after treating a critically ill child who required advanced cardiac and/or pulmonary support, offices were ill prepared to handle another serious pediatric illness or injury.

摘要

目的

确定已启动紧急医疗服务(EMS)以处理需要气道管理的危重症儿童的儿科诊所的准备情况。

方法

从先前一项关于儿童气道管理的前瞻性研究中,确定了15名最初前往儿科或家庭医疗诊所就诊,但需要启动EMS并接受心脏和/或呼吸支持的患者。在需要启动EMS的紧急情况发生两到四年后,联系这些诊所,以完成一份关于儿科紧急情况诊所准备情况的书面调查。

结果

15家诊所中有8家(53%)回复了调查。所有回复的诊所都有儿科医生坐诊,且所有诊所距离急诊科均在5英里范围内。气道紧急情况是诊所中最常见的紧急情况。应急设备和药物的可用性各不相同。所有诊所都备有沙丁胺醇,大多数(7/8)有带流量计的氧气源。然而,只有一半的诊所备有速效抗惊厥药,四分之一的诊所没有抗惊厥药。三家诊所缺少配备所有合适尺寸面罩的袋式面罩(手动)复苏器,三家诊所没有吸引器。未储备所有应急设备和药物最常见的原因是EMS响应迅速以及距离急诊科较近。

结论

即使在治疗了一名需要高级心脏和/或肺部支持的危重症儿童后,诊所仍未做好应对另一起严重儿科疾病或损伤的准备。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验