Fuchs S, Jaffe D M, Christoffel K K
Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Children's Hospital, PA 15213-2583.
Pediatrics. 1989 Jun;83(6):931-9.
Because of a nationally apparent increased interest in emergency medical services for children and the need for a greater understanding of the relationship between office pediatric and emergency department care of children, a questionnaire was mailed to practitioners to (1) describe office physician involvement with emergent conditions, and (2) evaluate physician office preparedness for pediatric emergencies. Responses were received from 280 pediatricians and family practitioners, including information regarding the availability of equipment and medication, physician training, and practice characteristics. Of the responding physicians, 62% reported that they assessed in their offices more than one child each week who required hospitalization or urgent treatment. A preparedness score was developed and multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between this score and physician and practice characteristics. The mean overall preparedness score was 53.7 of a possible 156 (range 5 to 136, SD = 31.3). Characteristics related to this score were type of practice and advanced cardiac life support certification. Large multispecialty practices and practices with physicians trained in advanced cardiac life support tended to have better preparedness scores. Family practitioners tended to have more complete stock of medications than pediatricians. The data presented suggested that critically ill children who enter the medical system via the office setting may have a better than even chance of finding the office unprepared to treat the emergency: in fewer than one third of the offices in which it was reported that at least one patient was seen weekly with asthma, anaphylaxis, sickle cell vasoocclusive crisis, status epilepticus, and sepsis were they fully equipped to treat emergencies related to these conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
由于全国范围内对儿童急诊医疗服务的兴趣明显增加,且需要更深入了解儿科门诊与儿童急诊科护理之间的关系,因此向从业者邮寄了一份问卷,以(1)描述门诊医生对紧急情况的参与情况,以及(2)评估医生办公室对儿科急诊的准备情况。收到了280名儿科医生和家庭医生的回复,包括有关设备和药物的可用性、医生培训以及执业特点的信息。在回复的医生中,62%报告称他们每周在办公室评估不止一名需要住院或紧急治疗的儿童。制定了一个准备分数,并使用多元回归分析来研究该分数与医生及执业特点之间的关系。可能的156分中,总体平均准备分数为53.7分(范围为5至136分,标准差=31.3)。与该分数相关的特征是执业类型和高级心脏生命支持认证。大型多专科诊所和有接受过高级心脏生命支持培训的医生的诊所往往有更好的准备分数。家庭医生的药物储备往往比儿科医生更齐全。所呈现的数据表明,通过门诊进入医疗系统的重症儿童可能有超过半数的几率发现门诊没有准备好治疗紧急情况:在报告每周至少有一名患者因哮喘、过敏反应、镰状细胞血管闭塞危象、癫痫持续状态和败血症就诊的诊所中,不到三分之一的诊所完全有能力治疗与这些病症相关的紧急情况。(摘要截选至250字)