Huang David T, Clermont Gilles, Sexton J Bryan, Karlo Crystal A, Miller Rachel G, Weissfeld Lisa A, Rowan Kathy M, Angus Derek C
CRISMA (Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness) Laboratory, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):165-76. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251505.76026.CF.
To determine whether safety culture factors varied across the intensive care units (ICUs) of a single hospital, between nurses and physicians, and to explore ICU nursing directors' perceptions of their personnel's attitudes.
Cross-sectional surveys using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire-ICU version, a validated, aviation industry-based safety culture survey instrument. It assesses culture across six factors: teamwork climate, perceptions of management, safety climate, stress recognition, job satisfaction, and work environment.
Four ICUs in one tertiary care hospital.
All ICU personnel.
We conducted the survey from January 1 to April 1, 2003, and achieved a 70.2% response rate (318 of 453). We calculated safety culture factor mean and percent-positive scores (percentage of respondents with a mean score of > or =75 on a 0-100 scale for which 100 is best) for each ICU. We compared mean ICU scores by ANOVA and percent-positive scores by chi-square. Mean and percent-positive scores by job category were modeled using a generalized estimating equations approach and compared using Wald statistics. We asked ICU nursing directors to estimate their personnel's mean scores and generated ratios of their estimates to the actual scores.Overall, factor scores were low to moderate across all factors (range across ICUs: 43.4-74.9 mean scores, 8.6-69.4 percent positive). Mean and percent-positive scores differed significantly (p < .0083, Bonferroni correction) across ICUs, except for stress recognition, which was uniformly low. Compared with physicians, nurses had significantly lower mean working conditions and perceptions of management scores. ICU nursing directors tended to overestimate their personnel's attitudes. This was greatest for teamwork, for which all director estimates exceeded actual scores, with a mean overestimate of 16%.
Significant safety culture variation exists across ICUs of a single hospital. ICU nursing directors tend to overestimate their personnel's attitudes, particularly for teamwork. Culture assessments based on institutional level analysis or director opinion may be flawed.
确定单一医院重症监护病房(ICU)之间、护士与医生之间的安全文化因素是否存在差异,并探讨ICU护理主任对其工作人员态度的看法。
采用《安全态度问卷-ICU版》进行横断面调查,这是一种经过验证的、基于航空业的安全文化调查工具。它从六个因素评估文化:团队合作氛围、对管理的认知、安全氛围、压力认知、工作满意度和工作环境。
一家三级护理医院的四个ICU。
所有ICU工作人员。
我们于2003年1月1日至4月1日进行了调查,回复率为70.2%(453人中的318人)。我们计算了每个ICU的安全文化因素平均得分和阳性百分比得分(在0至100分的量表上,平均得分大于或等于75分的受访者百分比,100分为最佳)。我们通过方差分析比较ICU的平均得分,通过卡方检验比较阳性百分比得分。按工作类别划分的平均得分和阳性百分比得分采用广义估计方程法建模,并使用Wald统计量进行比较。我们要求ICU护理主任估计其工作人员的平均得分,并计算他们的估计值与实际得分的比率。总体而言,所有因素的得分都处于低到中等水平(各ICU的范围:平均得分43.4 - 74.9,阳性百分比8.6 - 69.4)。除压力认知得分一直较低外,各ICU之间的平均得分和阳性百分比得分存在显著差异(p < .0083,Bonferroni校正)。与医生相比,护士的平均工作条件得分和对管理的认知得分显著较低。ICU护理主任往往高估其工作人员的态度。在团队合作方面最为明显,所有主任的估计值都超过了实际得分,平均高估了16%。
单一医院的各ICU之间存在显著的安全文化差异。ICU护理主任往往高估其工作人员的态度,尤其是在团队合作方面。基于机构层面分析或主任意见的文化评估可能存在缺陷。