• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估乌干达三家选定医院重症监护环境中患者安全文化的安全态度问卷的验证

Validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Settings of Three Selected Ugandan Hospitals.

作者信息

Atukwatse Joseph, Niyonzima Vallence, Asher Aliga Cliff, Nakandi Serwadda Jalia, Nankunda Rosemary, Nakiganda Catherine, Komugabe Peninah, Nantongo Hanifah

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Aga Khan University Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.

Department of Nursing, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

出版信息

Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2023 Jan 26;15:13-23. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S389978. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/DHPS.S389978
PMID:36727107
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9885870/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) short form (2006) is important for assessing patient safety culture in clinical environments. However, little is known about its validity and applicability in Uganda. This study validated the SAQ short form (2006) for use in assessing patient safety culture in critical care settings of hospitals in the Ugandan context.

METHODS

Using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods research design, the face, content and construct validity for the SAQ short form (2006) was assessed in a multi-phased approach. A panel of eight (8) purposively selected experts assessed the face and content validity in rounds 1 and 2, respectively, while construct validity was assessed in round 3 using data from a cross-sectional survey of 256 frontline health workers in critical care settings of the selected hospitals. Analysis of survey data followed confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha examined internal reliability.

RESULTS

Of the 36 items in the tool's original version, 33 were rated clear, with a score of 100% on face validity. The use of contextual vocabulary and formatting issues arose as concerns. The S-CVI/ was 100%, and S-CVI/ was 86.1%. Four new items added on effective communication as another dimension of patient safety culture. The survey had KMO=0.8605, the a priori-based model had a scale Cronbach's alpha=0.8881, with unsatisfactory goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.051, 90% CI: 0.044-0.057, close=0.427; chi-square=694.28, <0.001; CFI=0.884, TLI=0.871). The modified final model had a scale Cronbach's alpha =0.8967 and satisfactory goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.030, 90% CI: 0.019-0.039, close=1.000; chi-square=424.98, =0.002; CFI=0.966, TLI=0.960).

CONCLUSION

In the tool's original form, the face validity was lacking despite satisfactory scores on item clarity. Content validity was adequate, while construct validity required modifications in construct specifications. Reliability was adequate before and after specification modifications. The modified version has adequate psychometric properties for Uganda.

摘要

背景

安全态度问卷简版(2006年)对于评估临床环境中的患者安全文化非常重要。然而,对于其在乌干达的有效性和适用性知之甚少。本研究验证了安全态度问卷简版(2006年)在乌干达医院重症监护环境中用于评估患者安全文化的有效性。

方法

采用序贯探索性混合方法研究设计,分多阶段评估安全态度问卷简版(2006年)的表面效度、内容效度和结构效度。一个由八名经过有目的挑选的专家组成的小组分别在第1轮和第2轮评估表面效度和内容效度,而在第3轮使用来自所选医院重症监护环境中256名一线医护人员的横断面调查数据评估结构效度。调查数据分析采用验证性因子分析。Cronbach's α系数用于检验内部信度。

结果

该工具原始版本中的36个条目中,33个被评为清晰,表面效度得分为100%。出现了对使用情境词汇和格式问题的担忧。S-CVI/ 为100%,S-CVI/ 为86.1%。增加了四个关于有效沟通的新条目,作为患者安全文化的另一个维度。该调查的KMO = 0.8605,基于先验的模型的量表Cronbach's α系数 = 0.8881,拟合优度不理想(RMSEA = 0.051,90% CI:0.044 - 0.057,近似误差均方根 = 0.427;卡方 = 694.28,p < 0.001;CFI = 0.884,TLI = 0.871)。修改后的最终模型的量表Cronbach's α系数 = 0.8967,拟合优度令人满意(RMSEA = 0.030,90% CI:0.019 - 0.039,近似误差均方根 = 1.000;卡方 = 424.98,p = 0.002;CFI = 0.966,TLI = 0.960)。

结论

在该工具的原始形式中,尽管条目清晰度得分令人满意,但表面效度仍有欠缺。内容效度足够,而结构效度需要在结构规范方面进行修改。在规范修改前后,信度都足够。修改后的版本在乌干达具有足够的心理测量学特性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c482/9885870/65e75520b3db/DHPS-15-13-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c482/9885870/7def13a61bcf/DHPS-15-13-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c482/9885870/65e75520b3db/DHPS-15-13-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c482/9885870/7def13a61bcf/DHPS-15-13-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c482/9885870/65e75520b3db/DHPS-15-13-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Settings of Three Selected Ugandan Hospitals.用于评估乌干达三家选定医院重症监护环境中患者安全文化的安全态度问卷的验证
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2023 Jan 26;15:13-23. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S389978. eCollection 2023.
2
Development and Validation of a Malay Version Questionnaire to Evaluate Remote Health Monitoring of COVID-19 via Telehealth Applications: Navigating Telehealth Evolution.通过远程医疗应用评估 COVID-19 远程健康监测的马来语版本问卷的开发与验证:驾驭远程医疗的发展
Cureus. 2024 Aug 23;16(8):e67579. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67579. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Validation study of the Amharic version Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) in public hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.验证阿法尔语版安全态度问卷(SAQ)在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴公立医院中的有效性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10865-9.
4
Assessing the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), German language version in Swiss university hospitals--a validation study.评估安全态度问卷(SAQ),德语版,瑞士大学医院-验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Sep 10;13:347. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-347.
5
Psychometric Properties of an Arabic Safety Attitude Questionnaire (Short Form 2006).阿拉伯语安全态度问卷(2006年简版)的心理测量特性
Oman Med J. 2017 Mar;32(2):115-123. doi: 10.5001/omj.2017.21.
6
Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study.格鲁吉亚版安全态度问卷的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 13;10(2):e034863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034863.
7
Patient Safety Climate in Danish Primary Care: Adaption and Validation of the Danish Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-DK-PRIM).丹麦初级保健中的患者安全氛围:丹麦安全态度问卷(SAQ-DK-PRIM)的改编与验证
Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Aug 27;16:533-547. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S470111. eCollection 2024.
8
Adaption and validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for the Danish hospital setting.《安全态度问卷》在丹麦医院环境中的适应性与验证
Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 2;7:149-60. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S75560. eCollection 2015.
9
Content validity and internal consistency of the Dutch translation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: an observational study.荷兰版《安全态度问卷》的内容效度和内部一致性:一项观察性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Mar;49(3):327-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
10
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety attitudes build safety culture: Nurse/midwife leaders improving health care using quantitative data.安全态度塑造安全文化:护士/助产士领导者利用定量数据改善医疗保健。
J Nurs Manag. 2021 Nov;29(8):2433-2443. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13444. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
2
Factors influencing the patient safety climate in intensive care units: cross-sectional study.影响重症监护病房患者安全氛围的因素:横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jul 8;20(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00643-x.
3
Safety culture in two metropolitan Australian tertiary hospital intensive care units: A cross-sectional survey.
澳大利亚两个大都市三级医院重症监护病房的安全文化:一项横断面调查。
Aust Crit Care. 2020 Jan;33(1):4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.11.069. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
4
The surgical anxiety questionnaire (SAQ): development and validation.手术焦虑问卷(SAQ):编制与验证。
Psychol Health. 2019 Feb;34(2):129-146. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1502770. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
5
The safety attitudes questionnaire in Chinese: psychometric properties and benchmarking data of the safety culture in Beijing hospitals.中文版安全态度问卷:北京医院安全文化的心理测量特性及基准数据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 23;17(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2543-2.
6
Retrospective Descriptive Study of an Intensive Care Unit at a Ugandan Regional Referral Hospital.乌干达一家地区转诊医院重症监护病房的回顾性描述性研究。
World J Surg. 2016 Dec;40(12):2847-2856. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3644-5.
7
Nurse reported patient safety in low-resource settings: a cross-sectional study of MNCH nurses in Nigeria.护士报告的低资源环境下的患者安全:尼日利亚妇幼保健护士的横断面研究
Appl Nurs Res. 2015 Nov;28(4):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
8
Validation of the safety attitudes questionnaire (short form 2006) in Italian in hospitals in the northeast of Italy.意大利东北部医院中意大利语版安全态度问卷(2006年简版)的验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 24;15:284. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0951-8.
9
Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication.设计与实施内容效度研究:开发一种用于测量以患者为中心的沟通的工具。
J Caring Sci. 2015 Jun 1;4(2):165-78. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017. eCollection 2015 Jun.
10
Adaption and validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for the Danish hospital setting.《安全态度问卷》在丹麦医院环境中的适应性与验证
Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 2;7:149-60. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S75560. eCollection 2015.