• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉内膜切除术与血管成形术和支架置入术的比较:争论现状

Carotid endarterectomy compared with angioplasty and stenting: the status of the debate.

作者信息

Albuquerque F C, Teitelbaum G P, Larsen D W, Giannotta S L

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 1998 Dec 15;5(6):e2. doi: 10.3171/foc.1998.5.6.5.

DOI:10.3171/foc.1998.5.6.5
PMID:17112201
Abstract

Endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Recently, debate has arisen over the potential benefits of endovascular techniques. Although retrospective analyses of angioplasty and stenting procedures suggest comparable clinical efficacy to endarterectomy, prospective evaluation is pending. The authors review the status of the debate and discuss those issues on both sides that are particularly contentious and clinically relevant.

摘要

内膜切除术是有症状的颈内动脉狭窄患者的首选治疗方法。最近,关于血管内技术的潜在益处引发了争论。尽管对血管成形术和支架置入术的回顾性分析表明其临床疗效与内膜切除术相当,但前瞻性评估仍在进行中。作者回顾了这场争论的现状,并讨论了双方特别有争议且与临床相关的问题。

相似文献

1
Carotid endarterectomy compared with angioplasty and stenting: the status of the debate.颈动脉内膜切除术与血管成形术和支架置入术的比较:争论现状
Neurosurg Focus. 1998 Dec 15;5(6):e2. doi: 10.3171/foc.1998.5.6.5.
2
Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues.动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术:探索仍在继续。
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.022.
3
Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial.支架保护血管成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗有症状狭窄2年的结果:一项多国、前瞻性、随机试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):893-902. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70196-0. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
4
Restenosis after carotid angioplasty, stenting, or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS).颈动脉和椎动脉腔内血管成形术研究(CAVATAS)中颈动脉血管成形术、支架置入术或动脉内膜切除术后的再狭窄。
Stroke. 2005 Feb;36(2):281-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000152333.75932.fe. Epub 2005 Jan 13.
5
Endovascular treatment of extracranial carotid artery stenosis: update on carotid angioplasty and stenting.颅外颈动脉狭窄的血管内治疗:颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术的最新进展
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2005 May;15(2):383-95, xi. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2005.05.004.
6
Carotid endarterectomy and treatment options for carotid occlusive disease.颈动脉内膜切除术及颈动脉闭塞性疾病的治疗选择。
World Neurosurg. 2011 Dec;76(6 Suppl):S35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.05.037.
7
Carotid stenting.颈动脉支架置入术
Curr Opin Neurol. 2008 Feb;21(1):56-63. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3282f313d2.
8
Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial.症状性重度颈动脉狭窄患者内膜切除术与血管成形术对比研究(EVA-3S)试验:一项随机多中心试验的4年随访结果
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):885-92. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70195-9. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
9
Periprocedural complication rate of carotid endarterectomy versus carotid angioplasty and stenting: a retrospective study and review of the literature.
Isr Med Assoc J. 2011 Oct;13(10):601-4.
10
Anatomical and technical factors associated with stroke or death during carotid angioplasty and stenting: results from the endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial and systematic review.与颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术期间发生中风或死亡相关的解剖学和技术因素:症状性严重颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉内膜切除术与血管成形术(EVA-3S)试验和系统评价的结果。
Stroke. 2011 Feb;42(2):380-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.588772. Epub 2010 Dec 23.