Tzioras Spyridon, Pavlidis Nicholas, Paraskevaidis Evangelos, Ioannidis John P A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2007 Feb;33(1):24-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.09.007. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
A large number of trials have assessed various chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer, but there is uncertainty about the magnitude of survival benefits.
We searched (last update January 2006) for trials in women with locally advanced or disseminated cervical cancer that compared neo-adjuvant or concurrent chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone; or different chemotherapy regimens among themselves (with or without background radiotherapy in both arms). Sixty-five trials were identified with survival data on 11,180 women. Results for survival were combined with fixed and random effects models and between-study heterogeneity was estimated. Separate results were obtained for different regimens, cycle length, and type of chemotherapy (neo-adjuvant, concurrent, without radiotherapy).
Twenty two comparisons had survival data on 3837 women randomized to receive chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone; the summary relative hazard for mortality was 0.95, 95% CI, 0.83-1.08. Modest between-study heterogeneity (I2=38%) seemed to be due to contradictory results in early trials; trials published in the last decade had a summary relative hazard 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-1.02) and no between-study heterogeneity (I2=0%). Results were similar for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and for concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. Cisplatin or cisplatin-based combinations had no significant benefit overall, but a potential benefit was seen with short-length cycles (14 days) and a marginally significant harm with longer-length cycles (summary relative hazards 0.80, 95% CI, 0.66-0.99 and 1.18, 95% CI, 1.02-1.38, respectively). The summary relative hazard was 1.02, (95% CI, 0.84-1.24) for trials using neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.73-1.00) for trials using concurrent chemotherapy.
Evidence on chemotherapy in women with advanced cervical cancer is not encouraging for major survival benefits. However, small benefits have been observed in some trials, especially with short-length cycles of cisplatin-based regimens and concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
大量试验评估了多种化疗方案用于治疗晚期宫颈癌,但生存获益程度仍存在不确定性。
我们进行了检索(最后更新于2006年1月),查找针对局部晚期或播散性宫颈癌女性患者的试验,这些试验比较了新辅助化疗或同步化疗加放疗与单纯放疗;或不同化疗方案之间的比较(双臂均有或无背景放疗)。共识别出65项试验,涉及11,180名女性的生存数据。生存结果采用固定效应模型和随机效应模型进行合并,并估计研究间的异质性。针对不同方案、周期长度和化疗类型(新辅助化疗、同步化疗、无放疗)分别得出结果。
22项比较涉及3837名随机接受化疗加放疗与单纯放疗的女性的生存数据;死亡的汇总相对风险为0.95,95%可信区间为0.83 - 1.08。研究间存在适度异质性(I² = 38%)似乎是由于早期试验结果相互矛盾;过去十年发表的试验汇总相对风险为0.89(95%可信区间为0.78 - 1.02),且研究间无异质性(I² = 0%)。新辅助化疗和同步放化疗的结果相似。顺铂或基于顺铂的联合方案总体上无显著获益,但短周期(14天)有潜在获益,长周期有轻微显著危害(汇总相对风险分别为0.80,95%可信区间为0.66 - 0.99和1.18,95%可信区间为1.02 - 1.38)。采用新辅助化疗的试验汇总相对风险为1.02(95%可信区间为0.84 - 1.24),采用同步化疗的试验汇总相对风险为0.85(95%可信区间为0.73 - 1.00)。
晚期宫颈癌女性化疗的证据对于显著生存获益并不乐观。然而,在一些试验中观察到了小的获益,特别是基于顺铂方案的短周期以及同步化疗和放疗。