Douglas Pamela S
Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Nov 21;48(10):2152-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.107. Epub 2006 Oct 31.
Many factors, including disproportionate growth rates and exciting new technologies, have focused attention on cardiovascular imaging. However, critical examination of the field reveals a surprisingly weak evidence base and inconsistent systematic attention to quality improvement. Remedies span research and practice. The optimal clinical continuum of care begins with ensuring a proper match between the diagnostic test and the individual's clinical question, and progresses to include image acquisition, image interpretation, and results reporting. Better research methodologies are needed to more tightly link imaging use to improved outcomes in non-biased community populations. To accomplish these lofty goals, alignment across stakeholders is needed to ensure the necessary human and capital investment in research and systems of care.
包括不均衡的增长率和令人兴奋的新技术在内的诸多因素,已将人们的注意力聚焦于心血管成像。然而,对该领域的严格审视发现,其证据基础出奇地薄弱,且在质量改进方面缺乏一致的系统关注。补救措施涵盖研究与实践。最佳的临床连续护理始于确保诊断测试与个体临床问题的恰当匹配,并进而包括图像采集、图像解读和结果报告。需要更好的研究方法,以便在无偏见的社区人群中将成像应用与改善的结果更紧密地联系起来。为实现这些崇高目标,需要各利益相关方保持一致,以确保在研究和护理系统方面进行必要的人力和资本投资。