Mahutte Neal G, Arici Aydin
Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, USA.
Fertil Steril. 2007 Feb;87(2):241-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1457. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
To evaluate the role of GnRH antagonists in poor-responder protocols.
Literature review.
CONCLUSION(S): The optimum stimulation protocol for poor responders is unknown. Although many IVF programs currently use GnRH antagonists for poor responders, there have been only four prospective, randomized trials comparing GnRH antagonists to alternate protocols. None of these studies had sufficient power to evaluate a difference in pregnancy rates (PRs), and in all four cases, IVF outcomes were comparable. Nevertheless, interest in the use of GnRH antagonists in poor responders has continued. GnRH antagonists may be associated with simpler stimulation protocols, lower gonadotropin requirements, reduced patient costs, and shorter downtimes between consecutive cycles. However, the greatest advantage of GnRH antagonists may lie in the ability to assess ovarian reserves immediately prior to deciding whether or not to initiate gonadotropin stimulation. The ability to respond to cycle-to-cycle variation in antral follicle counts may allow the optimization of oocyte yield and reduce cycle cancellation rates. It remains to be seen if this approach (initiating gonadotropins only in cycles where an adequate antral follicle count is present) also translates into higher clinical PRs for poor responders.
评估促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂在卵巢低反应方案中的作用。
文献综述。
卵巢低反应者的最佳刺激方案尚不清楚。尽管目前许多体外受精(IVF)项目对卵巢低反应者使用GnRH拮抗剂,但仅有四项前瞻性随机试验将GnRH拮抗剂与其他方案进行了比较。这些研究均没有足够的效力来评估妊娠率(PRs)的差异,且在所有四个案例中,IVF结果具有可比性。然而,对卵巢低反应者使用GnRH拮抗剂的兴趣仍在持续。GnRH拮抗剂可能与更简单的刺激方案、更低的促性腺激素需求、降低患者成本以及连续周期之间更短的停工期有关。然而,GnRH拮抗剂的最大优势可能在于能够在决定是否开始促性腺激素刺激之前立即评估卵巢储备。对窦卵泡计数的周期间变化做出反应的能力可能有助于优化卵母细胞产量并降低周期取消率。对于卵巢低反应者,这种方法(仅在存在足够窦卵泡计数的周期中启动促性腺激素)是否也能转化为更高的临床PRs,仍有待观察。