Kapetanovic M C, Saxne T, Nilsson J-A, Geborek P
Department of Rheumatology, Lund University Hospital, Kioskgatan 3, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Apr;46(4):608-11. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel366. Epub 2006 Nov 18.
To compare serological response to influenza vaccine in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blockers and/or methotrexate (MTX) and controls.
Altogether, 149 patients with RA and 18 healthy subjects were vaccinated. Fifty patients were treated with TNF blockers (etanercept or infliximab) in combination with MTX (TNF blockers + MTX), while 62 patients received TNF blockers alone or with other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (TNF blockers without MTX). Thirty-seven patients were treated with MTX without TNF blockers (MTX). Vaccination was performed with trivalent vaccine (Influvax or Vaxigrip) both containing 15 microg haemagglutination inhibition (HI) of each of two A strains (H1N1 and H3N2) and one of B strains (B1 or B2). Serum samples were collected prior to and 4-6 weeks after vaccination and titrated against all four strains using HI assay. A positive immune response was defined as > or =4-fold increase compared with pre-vaccination titre levels. A titre > or =40 was considered protective. Pre- and post-vaccination geometric mean titres (GMT) were compared.
Post-vaccination titre levels increased significantly in all groups, also reflected by high frequencies of positive immune responders. A positive immune response to combinations of all strains was significantly better for the MTX group. Individuals with protective levels before vaccination responded less well as a group.
RA patients treated with MTX without TNF blockers had significantly better serological response to influenza vaccination compared with those receiving TNF blockers alone or in combination with MTX and/or other DMARDs. However, the immune response is sufficiently large to warrant influenza vaccination to all RA patients regardless of treatment.
比较长期接受肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)阻滞剂和/或甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者与对照组对流感疫苗的血清学反应。
共对149例RA患者和18名健康受试者进行了疫苗接种。50例患者接受TNF阻滞剂(依那西普或英夫利昔单抗)联合MTX治疗(TNF阻滞剂+MTX),而62例患者单独接受TNF阻滞剂或与其他改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)联合使用(无MTX的TNF阻滞剂)。37例患者接受无TNF阻滞剂的MTX治疗(MTX)。使用含有两种甲型毒株(H1N1和H3N2)及一种乙型毒株(B1或B2)各15微克血凝抑制(HI)成分的三价疫苗(流感全病毒疫苗或Vaxigrip)进行接种。在接种前和接种后4 - 6周采集血清样本,并使用HI试验针对所有四种毒株进行滴定。阳性免疫反应定义为与接种前滴度水平相比升高≥4倍。滴度≥40被认为具有保护性。比较接种前和接种后的几何平均滴度(GMT)。
所有组接种后的滴度水平均显著升高,这也体现在阳性免疫反应者的高频率上。MTX组对所有毒株组合的阳性免疫反应明显更好。接种前具有保护水平的个体作为一个群体反应较差。
与单独接受TNF阻滞剂或与MTX和/或其他DMARDs联合使用的患者相比,接受无TNF阻滞剂的MTX治疗的RA患者对流感疫苗的血清学反应明显更好。然而,免疫反应足够强烈,足以保证对所有RA患者进行流感疫苗接种,无论其治疗情况如何。