Jain Deepali, Sharma Mehar Chand, Sarkar Chitra, Gupta Deepak, Singh Manmohan, Mahapatra A K
Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Neurol India. 2006 Dec;54(4):394-8. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.28113.
Image-guided procedures such as computed tomography (CT) guided, neuronavigator-guided and ultrasound-guided methods can assist neurosurgeons in localizing the intraparenchymal lesion of the brain. However, despite improvements in the imaging techniques, an accurate diagnosis of intrinsic lesion requires tissue sampling and histological verification.
The present study was carried out to examine the reliability of the diagnoses made on tumor sample obtained via different stereotactic and ultrasound-guided brain biopsy procedures.
A retrospective analysis was conducted of all brain biopsies (frame-based and frameless stereotactic and ultrasound-guided) performed in a single tertiary care neurosciences center between 1995 and 2005. The overall diagnostic accuracy achieved on histopathology and correlation with type of biopsy technique was evaluated.
A total of 130 cases were included, which consisted of 82 males and 48 females. Age ranged from 4 to 75 years (mean age 39.5 years). Twenty per cent (27 patients) were in the pediatric age group, while 12% (16 patients) were >or= 60-years of age. A definitive histological diagnosis was established in 109 cases (diagnostic yield 80.2%), which encompassed 101 neoplastic and eight nonneoplastic lesions. Frame-based, frameless stereotactic and ultrasound-guided biopsies were done in 95, 15 and 20 patients respectively. Although the numbers of cases were small there was trend for better yield with frameless image-guided stereotactic biopsy and maximum diagnostic yield was obtained i.e, 87% (13/15) in comparison to conventional frame-based CT-guided stereotactic biopsy and ultrasound-guided biopsy.
Overall, a trend of higher diagnostic yield was seen in cases with frameless image-guided stereotactic biopsy. Thus, this small series confirms that frameless neuronavigator-guided stereotactic procedures represent the lesion sufficiently in order to make histopathologic diagnosis.
诸如计算机断层扫描(CT)引导、神经导航引导和超声引导等图像引导手术可帮助神经外科医生定位脑实质内病变。然而,尽管成像技术有所改进,但对原发性病变的准确诊断仍需要组织采样和组织学验证。
本研究旨在检验通过不同立体定向和超声引导脑活检程序获取的肿瘤样本诊断的可靠性。
对1995年至2005年在一家三级护理神经科学中心进行的所有脑活检(基于框架和无框架立体定向及超声引导)进行回顾性分析。评估了组织病理学的总体诊断准确性以及与活检技术类型的相关性。
共纳入130例病例,其中男性82例,女性48例。年龄范围为4至75岁(平均年龄39.5岁)。20%(27例患者)为儿童年龄组,而12%(16例患者)年龄≥60岁。109例病例建立了明确的组织学诊断(诊断率80.2%),其中包括101例肿瘤性病变和8例非肿瘤性病变。分别对95例、15例和20例患者进行了基于框架、无框架立体定向和超声引导活检。尽管病例数较少,但无框架图像引导立体定向活检的诊断率有提高的趋势,与传统基于框架的CT引导立体定向活检和超声引导活检相比,获得了最高诊断率,即87%(13/15)。
总体而言,无框架图像引导立体定向活检病例的诊断率有升高趋势。因此,这个小样本系列证实无框架神经导航引导立体定向程序能够充分显示病变,以便进行组织病理学诊断。