Juliano Laura M, Houtsmuller Elisabeth J, Stitzer Maxine L
Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Nov;14(4):429-38. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.14.4.429.
Lapses within the first 2 weeks of a smoking cessation attempt are strongly associated with a return to regular smoking (S. L. Kenford et al., 1994). Unfortunately, little is known about how to prevent an initial lapse from progressing to a full relapse, and presently there are no validated lapse-responsive therapeutic interventions. The present study tested the efficacy and feasibility of rapid smoking plus counseling as a novel lapse-responsive intervention. Sixty-seven participants enrolled in a smoking treatment program involving brief counseling and a 9-week course of bupropion. Beginning on the quit day, participants' smoking behavior was tracked daily for 14 days. Once an early smoking lapse was identified, participants were randomly assigned to receive either 3 sessions of rapid smoking plus counseling or no intervention (usual care). Consistent with previous research, participants who smoked during the first 2 weeks of the quit attempt had significantly poorer 6-month outcomes (3% abstinent) than did those who did not smoke (64% abstinent). Compared with early abstainers, early lapsers were more nicotine dependent and reported greater cravings and lower confidence in their ability to abstain from smoking during the first 48 hours of abstinence. As expected, rapid smoking produced a variety of aversive effects, including increased nausea, dizziness, and vomiting as well as sharply decreased cravings to smoke. However, rapid smoking did not improve abstinence outcomes relative to usual care. Although rapid smoking has been shown to be an effective treatment for initial smoking cessation, in this preliminary study the authors failed to demonstrate its effectiveness as a lapse-responsive treatment.
在戒烟尝试的头两周内出现复吸与恢复规律吸烟密切相关(S. L. 肯福德等人,1994年)。遗憾的是,对于如何防止初次复吸发展为完全复发,人们知之甚少,目前也没有经过验证的针对复吸的有效治疗干预措施。本研究测试了快速吸烟加咨询作为一种新型的针对复吸的干预措施的疗效和可行性。67名参与者参加了一个吸烟治疗项目,该项目包括简短咨询和为期9周的安非他酮疗程。从戒烟日开始,对参与者的吸烟行为进行为期14天的每日跟踪。一旦发现早期吸烟复吸情况,参与者被随机分配接受3次快速吸烟加咨询或不接受干预(常规护理)。与先前的研究一致,在戒烟尝试的头两周内吸烟的参与者6个月后的戒烟效果(3% 成功戒烟)明显比未吸烟的参与者(64% 成功戒烟)差。与早期戒烟者相比,早期复吸者对尼古丁的依赖性更强,报告称在戒烟的头48小时内烟瘾更大,且对自己戒烟能力的信心更低。不出所料,快速吸烟产生了多种厌恶效果,包括恶心、头晕和呕吐加剧,以及吸烟欲望急剧下降。然而,相对于常规护理,快速吸烟并没有改善戒烟效果。尽管快速吸烟已被证明是一种有效的初始戒烟治疗方法,但在这项初步研究中,作者未能证明其作为一种针对复吸的治疗方法的有效性。