根管桩与人类牙根牙本质的弯曲性能
Flexural properties of endodontic posts and human root dentin.
作者信息
Plotino Gianluca, Grande Nicola M, Bedini Rossella, Pameijer Cornelis H, Somma Francesco
机构信息
Department of Endodontics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
出版信息
Dent Mater. 2007 Sep;23(9):1129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.047. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the flexural modulus and flexural strength of different types of endodontic post in comparison with human root dentin.
METHODS
Three different types of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts and three metal posts each comprising 10 specimens (n=10) and 20 dentin bars were loaded to failure in a three-point bending test to determine the flexural modulus (GPa) and the flexural strength (MPa). Three randomly selected fiber posts of each group were evaluated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to illustrate the differences in mode of fracture. Data were subjected to a one-way ANOVA to determine significant differences between groups and the Bonferroni t-test multiple comparison was applied to investigate which mean values differed from one another with significance levels of P<0.05.
RESULTS
The flexural modulus recorded for the dentin bars was 17.5+/-3.8 GPa. The values for posts ranged from 24.4+/-3.8 GPa for silica fiber posts to 108.6+/-10.7 GPa for stainless steel posts. The flexural strength for dentin was 212.9+/-41.9 MPa, while the posts ranged from 879.1+/-66.2 MPa for silica fiber posts to 1545.3+/-135.9 MPa for cast gold posts. The ANOVA test analysis revealed significant differences between groups (P<0.05) for flexural modulus and flexural strength mean values.
SIGNIFICANCE
FRC posts have an elastic modulus that more closely approaches that of dentin while that for metal posts was much higher. The flexural strength of fiber and metal posts was respectively four and seven times higher than root dentin.
目的
与人类牙根牙本质相比,评估不同类型根管桩的弯曲模量和弯曲强度。
方法
三种不同类型的纤维增强复合材料(FRC)桩和三种金属桩,每种各10个样本(n = 10),以及20根牙本质棒在三点弯曲试验中加载直至破坏,以确定弯曲模量(GPa)和弯曲强度(MPa)。每组随机选择三根纤维桩,使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进行评估,以说明断裂模式的差异。数据进行单因素方差分析以确定组间的显著差异,并应用Bonferroni t检验多重比较来研究哪些平均值彼此有显著差异,显著性水平为P<0.05。
结果
牙本质棒记录的弯曲模量为17.5±3.8 GPa。桩的数值范围从硅纤维桩的24.4±3.8 GPa到不锈钢桩的108.6±10.7 GPa。牙本质的弯曲强度为212.9±41.9 MPa,而桩的数值范围从硅纤维桩的879.1±66.2 MPa到铸造金桩的1545.3±135.9 MPa。方差分析测试分析显示,弯曲模量和弯曲强度平均值在组间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。
意义
FRC桩的弹性模量更接近牙本质,而金属桩的弹性模量则高得多。纤维桩和金属桩的弯曲强度分别比牙根牙本质高四倍和七倍。