Staner Luc
Centre Hospitalier, Secteur VIII, Rouffach, France.
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2006;8(3):345-52. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2006.8.3/lstaner.
A surrogate outcome can be defined as an outcome that can be observed sooner, at lower cost, or less invasively than the true outcome, and that enables valid inferences about the effect of intervention on the true outcome. There is increasing interest in the use of surrogate outcomes of treatment efficacy measurement in investigational drug trials. However, the significance of surrogate markers of treatment outcome in neurology and psychiatry has not yet been sufficiently demonstrated. Few such markers have been adequately "validated, " that is, shown to predict the effect of the treatment on the clinical outcome of interest. In this article, evidence that would support the validation of such markers is discussed. Biomarkers used during early clinical development programs of new psychotropic compounds are considered in the contexts of Parkinson's disease, affective disorder, and schizophrenia. The particular case of neuroprotective trials is exemplified by Parkinson's disease, where a biomarker substituting for a clinical measure of progression could be considered as a surrogate treatment outcome.
替代结局可定义为一种结局,它比真实结局更早被观察到、成本更低或侵入性更小,并且能够对干预措施对真实结局的影响进行有效推断。在研究性药物试验中,使用替代结局来衡量治疗效果的兴趣与日俱增。然而,治疗结局的替代标志物在神经病学和精神病学中的意义尚未得到充分证明。很少有这样的标志物得到充分“验证”,即被证明能预测治疗对感兴趣的临床结局的影响。在本文中,将讨论支持此类标志物验证的证据。在帕金森病、情感障碍和精神分裂症的背景下,考虑了新型精神药物早期临床开发项目中使用的生物标志物。神经保护试验的特殊情况以帕金森病为例,在帕金森病中,替代疾病进展临床指标的生物标志物可被视为替代治疗结局。