Burlinson Brian, Tice Raymond R, Speit Günter, Agurell Eva, Brendler-Schwaab Susanne Y, Collins Andrew R, Escobar Patricia, Honma Masamitsu, Kumaravel Tirukalikundram S, Nakajima Madoka, Sasaki Yu F, Thybaud Veronique, Uno Yoshifumi, Vasquez Marie, Hartmann Andreas
Huntingdon Life Sciences, Cellular & Molecular Toxicology, Woolley Road, Alconbury, Huntington, Cambs PE28 4HS, UK.
Mutat Res. 2007 Feb 3;627(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.08.011. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
As part of the Fourth International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), held 9-10 September 2005 in San Francisco, California, an expert working group on the Comet assay was convened to review and discuss some of the procedures and methods recommended in previous documents. Particular attention was directed at the in vivo rodent, alkaline (pH >13) version of the assay. The aim was to review those protocol areas which were unclear or which required more detail in order to produce a standardized protocol with maximum acceptability by international regulatory agencies. The areas covered were: number of dose levels required, cell isolation techniques, measures of cytotoxicity, scoring of comets (i.e., manually or by image analysis), and the need for historical negative/positive control data. It was decided that a single limit dose was not sufficient although the required number of dose levels was not stipulated. The method of isolating cells was thought not to have a qualitative effect on the assay but more data were needed before a conclusion could be drawn. Concurrent measures of cytotoxicity were required with histopathological examination of tissues for necrosis or apoptosis as the "Gold Standard". As for analysing the comets, the consensus was that image analysis was preferred but not required. Finally, the minimal number of studies required to generate a historical positive or negative control database was not defined; rather the emphasis was placed on demonstrating the stability of the negative/positive control data. It was also agreed that a minimum reporting standard would be developed which would be consistent with OECD in vivo genotoxicity test method guidelines.
作为2005年9月9日至10日在加利福尼亚州旧金山举行的第四届遗传毒性测试国际研讨会(IWGT)的一部分,一个彗星试验专家工作组召开会议,对先前文件中推荐的一些程序和方法进行审查和讨论。特别关注的是该试验的体内啮齿动物碱性(pH>13)版本。目的是审查那些不明确或需要更多细节的方案领域,以便制定一个国际监管机构最大程度接受的标准化方案。涵盖的领域包括:所需剂量水平的数量、细胞分离技术、细胞毒性测量、彗星评分(即手动或通过图像分析)以及历史阴性/阳性对照数据的必要性。会议决定,单一极限剂量是不够的,尽管所需剂量水平的数量未作规定。细胞分离方法被认为对试验没有定性影响,但在得出结论之前还需要更多数据。需要同时进行细胞毒性测量,并对组织进行组织病理学检查以确定坏死或凋亡,这是“金标准”。至于彗星分析,共识是图像分析是首选但不是必需的。最后,未定义生成历史阳性或阴性对照数据库所需的最少研究数量;相反,重点是证明阴性/阳性对照数据的稳定性。会议还商定将制定一个最低报告标准,该标准将与经合组织体内遗传毒性测试方法指南一致。