Suppr超能文献

用于ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死的药物洗脱支架:我们需要随机试验吗? [已修正]

Drug-eluting stents for ST[corrected]-elevation acute myocardial infarction: do we need randomized trials?

作者信息

Ryan Jason, Cohen David J, Pinto Duane S

机构信息

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2006 Dec;17(8):667-71. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3280111042.

Abstract

Since their introduction, drug-eluting stents have rapidly altered modern medicine's approach to coronary artery disease. Before the development of drug-eluting stents, standard bare-metal stents were plagued by in-stent restenosis, requiring repeat revascularization in as many as 15-20% of patients during the first 6-12 months following implantation [1]. The currently approved drug-eluting stents have dramatically reduced this complication by using a polymer-impregnated coating that elutes either paclitaxel or sirolimus to inhibit smooth muscle proliferation. The pivotal TAXUS-IV [2] and SIRIUS [3] trials compared drug-eluting stents with standard bare-metal stents and found rates of target vessel revascularization ranging from 3 to 4.1% in stable coronary artery disease patients - far lower than that had been seen previously with conventional standard bare-metal stents. After their approval in April 2003, drug-eluting stents use in clinical practice expanded rapidly. Within 9 months of their introduction, drug-eluting stents comprised 35% of all stent implantations in the United States [4]. In the last year at our own institution, drug-eluting stents comprised over 85% of all stents implanted. Despite their extensive use, data regarding the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in certain clinical scenarios are limited. To date, the only published data supporting drug-eluting stents in ST[corrected]-elevation acute myocardial infarction come from the retrospective Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital registry [5] and the randomized, controlled single high-dose bolus tirofiban and sirolimus-eluting stent vs. abciximab and bare-metal stent in myocardial infarction study [6]. In this chapter, we discuss the theoretical risks and benefits of drug-eluting stents for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction, the available data regarding their use, and the areas in which future studies are needed.

摘要

自药物洗脱支架问世以来,其迅速改变了现代医学治疗冠状动脉疾病的方法。在药物洗脱支架研发之前,标准裸金属支架饱受支架内再狭窄问题困扰,在植入后的最初6至12个月内,多达15%至20%的患者需要再次进行血管重建[1]。目前已获批的药物洗脱支架通过使用浸渍聚合物涂层来洗脱紫杉醇或西罗莫司以抑制平滑肌增殖,从而显著降低了这一并发症的发生率。关键的TAXUS-IV[2]和SIRIUS[3]试验将药物洗脱支架与标准裸金属支架进行了比较,发现稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的靶血管重建率在3%至4.1%之间,远低于以往传统标准裸金属支架的情况。2003年4月获批后,药物洗脱支架在临床实践中的使用迅速扩大。在引入后的9个月内,药物洗脱支架在美国所有支架植入中所占比例达到35%[4]。在我们自己的机构,去年药物洗脱支架占所有植入支架的比例超过85%。尽管药物洗脱支架被广泛使用,但关于其在某些临床情况下的疗效和安全性的数据仍然有限。迄今为止,唯一支持在ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死中使用药物洗脱支架的已发表数据来自鹿特丹心脏病医院登记处的回顾性雷帕霉素洗脱支架评估研究[5]以及心肌梗死研究中随机对照的单次高剂量推注替罗非班与西罗莫司洗脱支架对比阿昔单抗与裸金属支架的研究[6]。在本章中,我们将讨论药物洗脱支架用于ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死的理论风险和益处、关于其使用的现有数据以及未来研究需要关注的领域。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验