Carozzi Francesca, Bisanzi Simonetta, Sani Cristina, Zappa Marco, Cecchini Silvia, Ciatto Stefano, Confortini Massimo
Centro per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica, Unità Operativa Citologia Analitica e Molecolare, Via Cosimo il Vecchio 2, 50127 Firenze, Italy.
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Feb;45(2):364-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00706-06. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
The AMPLICOR HPV test (AMP) and the Hybrid Capture 2 assay (HC2) detect 13 high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) types. Evaluation of comparative performance with clinical samples is needed to allow informed implementation of AMP into clinical practice. AMP was used (i) to assess the prevalence of HR-HPV in 1,032 samples of known cytology, HC2 status, and/or confirmed histology; (ii) to determine agreement between AMP and HC2; (iii) to evaluate the clinical sensitivity and specificity for detecting HR-HPV; and (iv) to detect the presence of biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The prevalence of HR-HPV was 39.3% and 45.6% by AMP and HC2, respectively. Overall agreement was 89.2% (kappa value, 0.78). Of 509 HR-HPV-negative specimens by HC2, 488 (95.9%) were AMP negative. Of 427 HR-HPV-positive specimens by HC2, 347 (81.2%) were AMP positive. In comparing the ability to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), the two tests were positive for all HSIL samples. Both tests performed similarly on CIN2+ samples (clinical sensitivities were 96.7% and 97.8%, respectively, for AMP and HC2). The clinical specificities of AMP and HC2 were comparable (54.9% versus 51.6%; P=0.18). Genotyping of 20 HC2-negative/AMP-positive cases using alternative technologies revealed target HR genotypes in 63.1% of cases and low-risk types in 15.7% of cases, while 21% of cases were negative. In conclusion, AMP provides a viable alternative to HC2, with good agreement for samples with high-grade cytology and similar sensitivity in detecting CIN2+ lesions.
安普利科人乳头瘤病毒检测(AMPLICOR HPV test,AMP)和第二代杂交捕获法(Hybrid Capture 2 assay,HC2)可检测13种高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HR-HPV)。需要对AMP与临床样本的比较性能进行评估,以便在临床实践中明智地应用AMP。AMP用于:(i)评估1032份已知细胞学、HC2检测结果和/或确诊组织学的样本中HR-HPV的流行率;(ii)确定AMP与HC2之间的一致性;(iii)评估检测HR-HPV的临床敏感性和特异性;(iv)检测活检确诊的高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的存在情况。AMP和HC2检测出的HR-HPV流行率分别为39.3%和45.6%。总体一致性为89.2%(kappa值为0.78)。在HC2检测为HR-HPV阴性的509份样本中,488份(95.9%)AMP检测为阴性。在HC2检测为HR-HPV阳性的427份样本中,347份(81.2%)AMP检测为阳性。在比较检测高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)的能力时,两种检测方法对所有HSIL样本均呈阳性。两种检测方法对CIN2+样本的表现相似(AMP和HC2的临床敏感性分别为96.7%和97.8%)。AMP和HC2的临床特异性相当(分别为54.9%和51.6%;P = 0.18)。使用替代技术对20例HC2阴性/AMP阳性病例进行基因分型,结果显示63.1%的病例检测到目标HR基因型,15.7%的病例检测到低危型,而21%的病例检测结果为阴性。总之,AMP为HC2提供了一种可行的替代方法,对于高级别细胞学样本具有良好的一致性,并且在检测CIN2+病变方面具有相似的敏感性。