Sandri Maria T, Lentati Paola, Benini Elvira, Dell'Orto Patrizia, Zorzino Laura, Carozzi Francesca M, Maisonneuve Patrick, Passerini Rita, Salvatici Michela, Casadio Chiara, Boveri Sara, Sideri Mario
Laboratory Medicine Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Jun;44(6):2141-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00049-06.
Many different methods with different sensitivity and specificity have been proposed to detect the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR HPV) in cervical samples. The HC2 is one of the most widely used. Recently, a new standardized PCR-based method, the AMPLICOR HPV test, has been introduced. Both assays recognize the same 13 HR HPV genotypes. The performances of these two commercially available assays were compared in 167 consecutive women (for a total of 168 samples) who presented at the Colposcopy Clinic either for a follow-up or for a diagnostic visit. Concordant results were found in 140/168 cervical samples (overall agreement, 83%; Cohen's kappa = 0.63). Twenty-eight samples gave discordant results: 20 were positive with the AMPLICOR HPV test and negative with the HC2 assay, and 8 were negative with the AMPLICOR HPV test and positive with the HC2 assay. The genotyping showed that no HR HPV was detected in the 8 HC2 assay-positive AMPLICOR HPV test-negative samples, while in 8/20 AMPLICOR HPV test-positive HC2 assay-negative samples, an HR HPV genotype was found. The AMPLICOR HPV test scored positive in a significantly higher percentage of subjects with normal Pap smears. All 7 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 patients scored positive with the AMPLICOR HPV test, while 2 of them scored negative with HC2. Both tests had positive results in the only patient with squamous cell carcinoma. In conclusion, this study shows that the HC2 assay and the AMPLICOR HPV test give comparable results, with both being suitable for routine use. The differences noted in some cases may suggest a different optimal clinical use.
已经提出了许多具有不同灵敏度和特异性的不同方法来检测宫颈样本中高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HR HPV)的存在。HC2是使用最广泛的方法之一。最近,一种新的基于标准化PCR的方法——AMPLICOR HPV检测被引入。这两种检测方法都能识别相同的13种HR HPV基因型。在167名连续就诊于阴道镜诊所进行随访或诊断的女性(共168个样本)中比较了这两种商业可用检测方法的性能。在140/168个宫颈样本中发现了一致的结果(总体一致性为83%;Cohen's kappa = 0.63)。28个样本给出了不一致的结果:20个样本AMPLICOR HPV检测为阳性而HC2检测为阴性,8个样本AMPLICOR HPV检测为阴性而HC2检测为阳性。基因分型显示,在8个HC2检测阳性但AMPLICOR HPV检测阴性的样本中未检测到HR HPV,而在20个AMPLICOR HPV检测阳性但HC2检测阴性的样本中有8个样本发现了HR HPV基因型。AMPLICOR HPV检测在巴氏涂片正常的受试者中阳性率显著更高。所有7例宫颈上皮内瘤变3级患者AMPLICOR HPV检测均为阳性,而其中2例HC2检测为阴性。鳞状细胞癌的唯一一名患者两种检测均为阳性。总之,本研究表明,HC2检测和AMPLICOR HPV检测结果相当,两者均适用于常规使用。在某些情况下发现的差异可能提示不同的最佳临床应用。