Jones Simon R, Fernyhough Charles
Department of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2007 Mar;27(2):140-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.10.001. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
The neuroimaging and neurophysiological literature on inner speech in healthy participants and those who experience auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) is reviewed. AVH-hearers in remission and controls do not differ neurologically on tasks involving low levels of verbal self-monitoring (VSM), such as reciting sentences in inner speech. In contrast, on tasks involving high levels of VSM, such as auditory verbal imagery, AVH-hearers in remission show less activation in areas including the middle and superior temporal gyri. This pattern of findings leads to a conundrum, given that mentation involving low levels of VSM is typically held to form the raw material for AVHs. We address this by noting that existing neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies have been based on unexamined assumptions about the form and developmental significance of inner speech. We set out a Vygotskian approach to AVHs which can account for why they are generally experienced as the voice of another person, with specific acoustic properties, and a tendency to take the form of commands. On this approach, which we argue is consistent with the neural correlates evidence, AVHs result from abnormalities in the transition between condensed and expanded dialogic inner speech. Further potential empirical tests of this model are discussed.
本文综述了关于健康参与者以及经历幻听(AVH)者内心言语的神经影像学和神经生理学文献。处于缓解期的幻听患者与对照组在涉及低水平言语自我监测(VSM)的任务(如内心背诵句子)上,神经方面并无差异。相比之下,在涉及高水平VSM的任务(如听觉言语想象)中,处于缓解期的幻听患者在包括颞中回和颞上回在内的区域表现出较少的激活。鉴于涉及低水平VSM的心理活动通常被认为是幻听的原材料,这一研究结果模式引发了一个难题。我们通过指出现有神经影像学和神经生理学研究基于对内心言语形式和发展意义未经检验的假设来解决这一问题。我们提出一种维果茨基式的幻听研究方法,该方法可以解释为什么幻听通常被体验为另一个人的声音,具有特定的声学特性,并且倾向于采取命令的形式。我们认为这种方法与神经关联证据一致,幻听是由浓缩和扩展的对话式内心言语之间转换异常导致的。本文还讨论了该模型进一步的潜在实证检验。