• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[大剂量免疫球蛋白治疗类风湿关节炎:7例初步研究]

[High-dose immunoglobulins for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: pilot study of 7 cases].

作者信息

Tumiati B, Veneziani M, Castellini G, Belelli A

机构信息

II Divisione Medica, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia.

出版信息

Medicina (Firenze). 1990 Oct-Dec;10(4):398-401.

PMID:1712419
Abstract

High intravenous doses (400 mg/kg) of gammaglobulin (IVIG) were administered monthly for six months to 7 patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In all cases, previous treatment with NSAIDs and corticosteroids and in 3 of them with gold and/or methotrexate had been ineffective. A 50 per cent improvement of Ritchie index was obtained in 6/7 patients, morning stiffness was reduced from greater than 2 hours to less than 30 minutes in 6/7 patients. Swollen joints and Lee index improved in all patients. ESR did not show any change but RCP improved in 6/7 patients. The study of lymphocyte subpopulation showed no substantial changes in CD20+, CD3+, CD4 and CD8 cells as well as in CD4/CD8 ratio and a significant increase in 2H4+T cells without changes in 4B4+ subpopulation. IVIG improved the clinical and laboratory features of patients with severe RA. The major problem raised by IVIG therapy is its high cost suggesting that this therapy should only be applied in well selected patients with RA.

摘要

对7例重症类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者每月静脉注射高剂量(400毫克/千克)丙种球蛋白(IVIG),持续6个月。所有患者此前使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和皮质类固醇治疗均无效,其中3例使用金制剂和/或甲氨蝶呤治疗也无效。7例患者中有6例的里奇指数改善了50%,7例患者中有6例的晨僵时间从超过2小时缩短至不到30分钟。所有患者的肿胀关节和李氏指数均有所改善。血沉(ESR)无变化,但7例患者中有6例的类风湿因子凝聚物(RCP)有所改善。淋巴细胞亚群研究显示,CD20 +、CD3 +、CD4和CD8细胞以及CD4/CD8比值无显著变化,2H4 + T细胞显著增加,4B4 +亚群无变化。IVIG改善了重症RA患者的临床和实验室特征。IVIG治疗引发的主要问题是成本高昂,这表明该疗法仅应适用于精心挑选的RA患者。

相似文献

1
[High-dose immunoglobulins for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: pilot study of 7 cases].[大剂量免疫球蛋白治疗类风湿关节炎:7例初步研究]
Medicina (Firenze). 1990 Oct-Dec;10(4):398-401.
2
Influence of longterm therapy with methotrexate and low dose corticosteroids on type 1 and type 2 cytokine production in CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.甲氨蝶呤和低剂量皮质类固醇长期治疗对类风湿关节炎患者CD4+和CD8+ T淋巴细胞中1型和2型细胞因子产生的影响。
J Rheumatol. 2001 Aug;28(8):1793-9.
3
Rheumatoid arthritis: workload and outcome over 10 years.类风湿关节炎:10年的工作量与结局
Q J Med. 1991 Jun;79(290):461-76.
4
[High-dose immunoglobulin therapy of rheumatoid arthritis].[类风湿关节炎的大剂量免疫球蛋白治疗]
Infusionsther Transfusionsmed. 1993 Apr;20 Suppl 1:110-5; discussion 116-7.
5
Therapeutic use of monoclonal anti-CD4 antibody in rheumatoid arthritis.
J Rheumatol. 1991 Mar;18(3):325-7.
6
A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled multicenter trial of murine anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.一项关于鼠抗CD4单克隆抗体治疗类风湿关节炎的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照多中心试验。
J Rheumatol. 1998 Aug;25(8):1457-61.
7
High dose versus low dose fludarabine in the treatment of patients with severe refractory rheumatoid arthritis.高剂量与低剂量氟达拉滨治疗重度难治性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效比较
J Rheumatol. 1998 Sep;25(9):1694-704.
8
Analysis of Th1 and Th2 cytokines expressing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in rheumatoid arthritis by flow cytometry.通过流式细胞术分析类风湿关节炎中表达CD4 +和CD8 + T细胞的Th1和Th2细胞因子
J Rheumatol. 2000 May;27(5):1128-35.
9
[Clinical and immunological effects of leukapheresis therapy using cotton-wool filter for patients with rheumatoid arthritis].[使用棉絮滤器的白细胞分离术治疗类风湿关节炎患者的临床和免疫学效应]
Ryumachi. 1996 Jun;36(3):493-502.
10
Vaccination with selected synovial T cells in rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎中选用滑膜T细胞进行疫苗接种。
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Feb;56(2):453-63. doi: 10.1002/art.22316.

引用本文的文献

1
Immunomodulation of autoimmune diseases by high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins.大剂量静脉注射免疫球蛋白对自身免疫性疾病的免疫调节作用。
Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2001 Dec;23(4):447-57. doi: 10.1007/s281-001-8170-y.