• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患有多小脑回畸形/智力障碍患者的分子核型分析:正常变异与致病变异之间模糊的界限

Molecular karyotyping of patients with MCA/MR: the blurred boundary between normal and pathogenic variation.

作者信息

de Ravel T J L, Balikova I, Thienpont B, Hannes F, Maas N, Fryns J-P, Devriendt K, Vermeesch J R

机构信息

Centre for Human Genetics, UZ Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;115(3-4):225-30. doi: 10.1159/000095918.

DOI:10.1159/000095918
PMID:17124404
Abstract

Molecular karyotyping has revealed that microdeletions/duplications in the human genome are a major cause of multiple congenital anomalies associated with mental retardation (MCA/MR). The identification of a de novo chromosomal imbalance in a patient with MCA/MR is usually considered causal for the phenotype while a chromosomal imbalance inherited from a phenotypically normal parent is considered as a benign variation and not related to the disorder. Around 40% of imbalances in patients with MCA/MR in this series is inherited from a healthy parent and the majority of these appear to be (extremely) rare variants. As some of these contain known disease-causing genes and have also been found to be de novo in MCA/MR patients, this challenges the general view that such familial variants are innocent and of no major phenotypic consequence. Rather, we argue, that human genomes can be tolerant of genomic copy number variations depending on the genetic and environmental background and that different mechanisms play a role in determining whether these chromosomal imbalances manifest themselves.

摘要

分子核型分析显示,人类基因组中的微缺失/微重复是导致多种先天性异常伴智力障碍(MCA/MR)的主要原因。在患有MCA/MR的患者中,鉴定出的新发染色体失衡通常被认为是导致该表型的原因,而从表型正常的父母遗传而来的染色体失衡则被视为良性变异,与该疾病无关。在本系列MCA/MR患者中,约40%的失衡是从健康父母遗传而来的,其中大多数似乎是(极其)罕见的变异。由于其中一些包含已知的致病基因,并且在MCA/MR患者中也被发现是新发的,这挑战了普遍观点,即此类家族性变异是无害的,不会产生重大表型后果。相反,我们认为,人类基因组可以根据遗传和环境背景容忍基因组拷贝数变异,并且不同的机制在决定这些染色体失衡是否表现出来方面发挥作用。

相似文献

1
Molecular karyotyping of patients with MCA/MR: the blurred boundary between normal and pathogenic variation.患有多小脑回畸形/智力障碍患者的分子核型分析:正常变异与致病变异之间模糊的界限
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;115(3-4):225-30. doi: 10.1159/000095918.
2
Structural chromosomal abnormalities in patients with mental retardation and/or multiple congenital anomalies: a new series of 24 patients.智力发育迟缓及/或多发先天性异常患者的染色体结构异常:24例新病例系列研究
Genet Couns. 2012;23(2):289-96.
3
Subtelomeric imbalances in phenotypically normal individuals.表型正常个体中的亚端粒失衡。
Hum Mutat. 2007 Oct;28(10):958-67. doi: 10.1002/humu.20537.
4
Using a combination of MLPA kits to detect chromosomal imbalances in patients with multiple congenital anomalies and mental retardation is a valuable choice for developing countries.对于发展中国家而言,使用多种多重连接探针扩增(MLPA)试剂盒组合来检测患有多种先天性异常和智力障碍患者的染色体失衡是一种有价值的选择。
Eur J Med Genet. 2011 Jul-Aug;54(4):e425-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
5
Emerging patterns of cryptic chromosomal imbalance in patients with idiopathic mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies: a new series of 140 patients and review of published reports.特发性智力障碍和多发先天性畸形患者中隐匿性染色体失衡的新趋势:140例新病例系列及已发表报告综述
J Med Genet. 2006 Aug;43(8):625-33. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.039453. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
6
Additional cryptic CNVs in mentally retarded patients with apparently balanced karyotypes.核型看似正常的智障患者中额外的隐匿性拷贝数变异
Eur J Med Genet. 2010 Sep-Oct;53(5):227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
7
Structural genomic variation in intellectual disability.智力残疾中的结构基因组变异。
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;838:77-95. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-507-7_3.
8
Challenges for CNV interpretation in clinical molecular karyotyping: lessons learned from a 1001 sample experience.临床分子核型分析中CNV解释的挑战:从1001例样本经验中吸取的教训
Eur J Med Genet. 2009 Nov-Dec;52(6):398-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
9
Detection of chromosomal imbalances in children with idiopathic mental retardation by array based comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH).采用基于微阵列的比较基因组杂交技术(array-CGH)检测特发性智力障碍儿童的染色体失衡情况。
J Med Genet. 2005 Sep;42(9):699-705. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.029637.
10
Int22h-1/int22h-2-mediated Xq28 rearrangements: intellectual disability associated with duplications and in utero male lethality with deletions.Int22h-1/int22h-2 介导的 Xq28 重排:与重复相关的智力障碍和与缺失相关的宫内男性致死性。
J Med Genet. 2011 Dec;48(12):840-50. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100125. Epub 2011 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A Multicentric Brazilian Investigative Study of Copy Number Variations in Patients with Congenital Anomalies and Intellectual Disability.巴西多中心研究:先天性畸形和智力障碍患者的拷贝数变异分析。
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 6;8(1):13382. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31754-2.
2
Practical guidelines for interpreting copy number gains detected by high-resolution array in routine diagnostics.高分辨率阵列检测到拷贝数增益的常规诊断中的解读实用指南。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;20(2):161-5. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.174. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
3
Medical conditions in autism spectrum disorders.
自闭症谱系障碍中的医学状况。
J Neurodev Disord. 2009 Jun;1(2):102-13. doi: 10.1007/s11689-009-9021-z. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
4
A new diagnostic workflow for patients with mental retardation and/or multiple congenital abnormalities: test arrays first.针对智力障碍和/或多发性先天畸形患者的新型诊断工作流程:先进行检测阵列。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 Nov;17(11):1394-402. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.74. Epub 2009 May 13.
5
Benign copy number changes in clinical cytogenetic diagnostics by array CGH.通过阵列比较基因组杂交技术在临床细胞遗传学诊断中检测良性拷贝数变化
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;123(1-4):94-101. doi: 10.1159/000184696. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
6
Molecular karyotyping in patients with mental retardation using 100K single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays.使用100K单核苷酸多态性阵列对智力障碍患者进行分子核型分析。
J Med Genet. 2007 Oct;44(10):629-36. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2007.050914. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
7
What's new in karyotyping? The move towards array comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH).
Eur J Pediatr. 2007 Jul;166(7):637-43. doi: 10.1007/s00431-007-0463-6. Epub 2007 Mar 20.