Breeze A C G, Cross J J, Hackett G A, Jessop F A, Joubert I, Lomas D J, Set P A K, Whitehead A L, Lees C C
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;28(7):918-24. doi: 10.1002/uog.3886.
Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be an alternative to conventional autopsy. However, it is unclear how confident radiologists are in reporting such studies. We sought to determine the confidence with which radiologists report on various fetal organs by developing a scale to express their confidence of normality and abnormality, and to place this in the context of a pathological diagnosis of whether the organ was in fact normal or abnormal.
Thirty fetuses, aged 16-39 gestational weeks and weighing 61-3270 g, underwent postmortem MRI prior to conventional autopsy. MRI studies were reported by two radiologists with access to the clinical and sonographic history: a neuroradiologist, reporting head and neck, and a pediatric radiologist, reporting thorax, abdomen and pelvis. Radiologists used a scale (0 = definitely abnormal, 100 = definitely normal, 50 = unable to comment) to indicate their confidence of anatomical structures being normal or abnormal, using a checklist. Conventional autopsies were performed by pediatric pathologists blinded to the MRI findings, and these were considered the reference standard.
Most normal fetal organs had high scores on postmortem MRI, with median confidence scores above 80. However, the atrioventricular valves, duodenum, bowel rotation and pancreas proved more difficult to assess, with median scores of 50, 60, 60 and 62.5, respectively. Abnormal cardiac atria and ventricles, kidneys, cerebral hemispheres and corpus callosum were always detected with high or moderate degrees of confidence (median scores of 2.5, 5, 0, 0 and 30 respectively). However, in two cases with abnormal cardiac outflow tracts, both cases scored 50. Kappa values, assessing agreement between MRI diagnoses of abnormality and autopsy, were high for the brain (0.83), moderate for the lungs (0.56) and fair for the heart (0.33).
This scoring system represents an attempt to define the confidence of radiologists to report varying degrees of normality and abnormality following z ex-utero fetal MRI. While most fetal anatomy is clearly visualized on postmortem MRI, radiologists may lack confidence reporting such studies and there are particular problems with assessment of some cardiac and gastrointestinal structures, both normal and abnormal.
尸检磁共振成像(MRI)可能是传统尸检的一种替代方法。然而,目前尚不清楚放射科医生对报告此类研究的信心如何。我们试图通过制定一个量表来确定放射科医生对各种胎儿器官报告的信心,以表达他们对正常和异常的信心程度,并将其与器官实际正常或异常的病理诊断情况相结合。
30例孕周为16 - 39周、体重为61 - 3270克的胎儿在进行传统尸检前接受了尸检MRI检查。两名可获取临床和超声检查病史的放射科医生报告MRI研究结果:一名神经放射科医生报告头颈部,一名儿科放射科医生报告胸部、腹部和骨盆。放射科医生使用一个量表(0 = 肯定异常,100 = 肯定正常,50 = 无法评价),通过检查表来表明他们对解剖结构正常或异常的信心。传统尸检由对MRI结果不知情的儿科病理学家进行,这些结果被视为参考标准。
大多数正常胎儿器官在尸检MRI上得分较高,中位信心得分高于80分。然而,房室瓣、十二指肠、肠旋转和胰腺的评估难度较大,中位得分分别为50分、60分、60分和62.5分。异常的心房、心室、肾脏、大脑半球和胼胝体总是以高或中等程度的信心被检测到(中位得分分别为2.5分、5分、0分、0分和30分)。然而,在两例心脏流出道异常的病例中,两例得分均为50分。评估MRI异常诊断与尸检之间一致性的kappa值,大脑为高(0.83),肺部为中等(0.56),心脏为一般(0.33)。
该评分系统试图界定放射科医生在报告胎儿体外MRI检查后不同程度的正常和异常情况时的信心。虽然大多数胎儿解剖结构在尸检MRI上能清晰显示,但放射科医生在报告此类研究时可能缺乏信心,并且在评估一些正常和异常的心脏及胃肠道结构时存在特殊问题。