Hyde Justeen, Kim Basil, Martinez Linda Sprague, Clark Mary, Hacker Karen
Justeen Hyde is Senior Scientist, Institute for Community Health, Cambridge, Mass, USA.
Disaster Manag Response. 2006 Oct-Dec;4(4):106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.dmr.2006.08.002.
Local public health authorities (LPHAs) are recognized as playing critical roles in response to biological, chemical, and other health emergencies. An influx of emergency preparedness funding has created new and expanding responsibilities for LPHAs. Concern that funding for emergency response is diverting attention and resources away from other core public health responsibilities is increasing. In order to determine the impact of emergency preparedness funding on public health infrastructure, qualitative interviews with 27 LPHAs in the metro-Boston area were conducted as part of an on-going evaluation of preparedness planning in Massachusetts. Feedback on the benefits and challenges of recent emergency preparedness planning mandates was obtained. Benefits include opportunities to develop relationships within and across public health departments and increases in communication between local and state authorities. Challenges include budget constraints, staffing shortages, and competing public responsibilities. Policy recommendations for improving planning for emergency response at the local level are provided.
地方公共卫生当局(LPHAs)被认为在应对生物、化学及其他卫生紧急情况中发挥着关键作用。应急准备资金的涌入给地方公共卫生当局带来了新的、不断增加的责任。人们越来越担心应急响应资金正将注意力和资源从其他核心公共卫生责任上转移开。为了确定应急准备资金对公共卫生基础设施的影响,作为对马萨诸塞州应急准备计划正在进行的评估的一部分,对大波士顿地区的27个地方公共卫生当局进行了定性访谈。获得了关于近期应急准备计划要求的益处和挑战的反馈。益处包括在公共卫生部门内部及之间建立关系的机会,以及地方和州当局之间沟通的增加。挑战包括预算限制、人员短缺以及相互竞争的公共责任。本文还提供了关于改进地方层面应急响应规划的政策建议。