Suppr超能文献

衡量与健康相关的污名——文献综述

Measuring health-related stigma--a literature review.

作者信息

Van Brakel Wim H

机构信息

Royal Tropical Institute, Leprosy Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychol Health Med. 2006 Aug;11(3):307-34. doi: 10.1080/13548500600595160.

Abstract

Stigma related to chronic health conditions such as HIV/AIDS, leprosy, tuberculosis, mental illness and epilepsy is a global phenomenon with a severe impact on individuals and their families, and on the effectiveness of public health programmes. To compare stigma measurement in different disciplines, a literature review was conducted. References were obtained through a search of literature databases and through examining relevant bibliographies. Sixty-three papers were selected that addressed the issue of measurement of stigma or related constructs and that contained a sample of the instrument or items used. Five unpublished studies were also included in the review. The aspects of health-related stigma used for assessment can be grouped in five categories. First, the experience of actual discrimination and/or participation restrictions on the part of the person affected; second, attitudes towards the people affected; third, perceived or felt stigma; fourth, self or internalized stigma; and fifth, discriminatory and stigmatizing practices in (health) services, legislation, media and educational materials. Within each of these areas, different research methods have been used, including questionnaires, qualitative methods, indicators and scales. The characteristics of the instruments considered most promising are described and compared. The purpose of stigma assessment is to increase our understanding of stigma and its determinants and dynamics, to determine its extent or severity in a given setting or target group and to monitor changes in stigma over time. The conclusions from this review are that (a) the consequences of stigma are remarkably similar in different health conditions, cultures and public health programmes; (b) many instruments have been developed to assess the intensity and qualities of stigma, but often these have been condition-specific; and (c) development of generic instruments to assess health-related stigma may be possible. To achieve this aim, existing instruments should be further validated, developed or adapted for generic use, where possible.

摘要

与诸如艾滋病毒/艾滋病、麻风病、结核病、精神疾病和癫痫等慢性健康状况相关的耻辱感是一种全球现象,对个人及其家庭以及公共卫生项目的有效性都有严重影响。为了比较不同学科中耻辱感的测量方法,我们进行了一项文献综述。通过搜索文献数据库和查阅相关参考文献获取资料。我们挑选了63篇论述耻辱感测量问题或相关概念且包含所使用工具或条目的样本的论文。该综述还纳入了5项未发表的研究。用于评估的与健康相关的耻辱感方面可分为五类。第一,受影响者实际遭受的歧视和/或参与限制的经历;第二,对受影响者的态度;第三,感知到的或感受到的耻辱感;第四,自我或内化的耻辱感;第五,(卫生)服务、立法、媒体和教育材料中的歧视性和污名化行为。在这些领域中的每一个,都采用了不同的研究方法,包括问卷调查、定性方法、指标和量表。我们描述并比较了被认为最有前景的工具的特点。耻辱感评估的目的是增进我们对耻辱感及其决定因素和动态变化的理解,确定其在特定环境或目标群体中的程度或严重程度,并监测耻辱感随时间的变化。该综述的结论是:(a)耻辱感的后果在不同的健康状况、文化和公共卫生项目中非常相似;(b)已经开发了许多工具来评估耻辱感的强度和性质,但这些工具往往是针对特定疾病的;(c)开发通用工具来评估与健康相关的耻辱感是有可能的。为实现这一目标,应尽可能进一步验证、开发或改编现有工具以供通用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验