• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于缓释茶碱治疗哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病安全性的前瞻性调查。

A prospective survey on safety of sustained-release theophylline in treatment of asthma and COPD.

作者信息

Makino Sohei, Adachi Mitsuru, Ohta Ken, Kihara Norio, Nakajima Sigenori, Nishima Sankei, Fukuda Takeshi, Miyamoto Terumasa

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Jobu Hospital for Respiratory Disease, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.

出版信息

Allergol Int. 2006 Dec;55(4):395-402. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.55.395.

DOI:10.2332/allergolint.55.395
PMID:17130682
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Theophylline is a useful drug for the treatment of asthma. The Asthma Prevention and Management Guidelines (JGL) recommend use of sustained-release theophylline products as controllers and of injectable aminophylline products as relievers. The Global Initiative for Asthma: Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, the NHLB/WHP Workshop Report 1995 (GINA, 1995) and guidelines in Western countries recommend sustained-release theophylline, but not as positively as in the JGL. The aim of this survey was to determine the occurrence of serious adverse reactions.

METHODS

The survey was conducted in 66 institutions staffed by physicians certified by the Japanese Society of Allergology (JSA). The target diseases were asthma and COPD including chronic bronchitis and pulmonary emphysema, which are indications for use of sustained-release theophylline products in Japan.

RESULTS

3,921 patients were included in the safety evaluation. No serious adverse reactions were observed among the patients in this survey, although 54 patients (1.38%) exhibited non-serious adverse reactions. The incidence of adverse reactions was found to be high in patients who had begun use of sustained-release theophylline products at the time of registration in this survey, and in patients who were concomitantly taking macrolide antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The present survey demonstrates that sustained-release theophylline is safe, as long as used appropriately, although adverse reactions tend to develop early after initiation of administration.

摘要

背景

茶碱是治疗哮喘的一种有效药物。《哮喘预防与管理指南》(JGL)推荐使用缓释茶碱产品作为控制药物,注射用氨茶碱产品作为缓解药物。《全球哮喘防治创议:哮喘管理和预防全球策略》、1995年美国国立心肺血液研究所/世界卫生组织研讨会报告(GINA,1995)以及西方国家的指南推荐使用缓释茶碱,但不像JGL那样积极。本次调查的目的是确定严重不良反应的发生率。

方法

该调查在66家由日本变态反应学会(JSA)认证的医生所在机构进行。目标疾病为哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD),包括慢性支气管炎和肺气肿,这些在日本是使用缓释茶碱产品的适应证。

结果

3921例患者纳入安全性评估。本次调查中患者未观察到严重不良反应,尽管有54例患者(1.38%)出现非严重不良反应。在本次调查登记时开始使用缓释茶碱产品的患者以及同时服用大环内酯类抗生素的患者中,不良反应发生率较高。

结论

本次调查表明,只要合理使用,缓释茶碱是安全的,尽管不良反应往往在给药开始后早期出现。

相似文献

1
A prospective survey on safety of sustained-release theophylline in treatment of asthma and COPD.一项关于缓释茶碱治疗哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病安全性的前瞻性调查。
Allergol Int. 2006 Dec;55(4):395-402. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.55.395.
2
Prospective survey on safety evaluation of injectable methylxanthines in Japan.日本注射用甲基黄嘌呤安全性评价的前瞻性调查。
Allergol Int. 2006 Sep;55(3):295-9. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.55.295.
3
A prospective clinical study of theophylline safety in 3810 elderly with asthma or COPD.一项针对3810名老年哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行的茶碱安全性前瞻性临床研究。
Respir Med. 2004 Oct;98(10):1016-24. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.02.020.
4
Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of theophylline and doxofylline in patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.氨茶碱与多索茶碱治疗支气管哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效及安全性对比研究
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2015 Sep;26(5):443-51. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2015-0006.
5
[Corrected conclusion in the SBU report: no supplementary effect of theophylline in acute, moderate asthma, but this is not documented in severe life-threatening asthma].[SBU报告中的修正结论:茶碱对急性中度哮喘无补充作用,但在严重危及生命的哮喘中未得到证实]
Lakartidningen. 2001 Sep 12;98(37):3961.
6
[Development of theophylline in treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].[茶碱在哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗中的发展]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2004 Jun;26(3):319-22.
7
Efficacy and safety of doxofylline compared to theophylline in chronic reversible asthma -- a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled multicentre clinical trial.多索茶碱与氨茶碱治疗慢性可逆性哮喘的疗效及安全性比较——一项双盲随机安慰剂对照多中心临床试验
Med Sci Monit. 2002 Apr;8(4):CR297-304.
8
The theophylline dilemma.氨茶碱困境
Ther Hung. 1992;40(1):3-7.
9
Risk of emergency care, hospitalization, and ICU stays for acute asthma among recipients of salmeterol.沙美特罗使用者中急性哮喘的急诊护理、住院和入住重症监护病房的风险。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Sep;158(3):857-61. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.3.9803047.
10
A randomized open-label comparative study of montelukast versus theophylline added to inhaled corticosteroid in asthmatic children.孟鲁司特与氨茶碱加吸入性糖皮质激素用于哮喘儿童的随机开放标签对照研究。
Allergol Int. 2006 Sep;55(3):287-93. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.55.287.

引用本文的文献

1
Approaches to drug therapy for COPD in Russia: a proposed therapeutic algorithm.俄罗斯慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的药物治疗方法:一种建议的治疗算法
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Apr 11;12:1125-1133. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S125594. eCollection 2017.
2
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome (ACOS): structured literature review and physician insights.哮喘与慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠综合征(ACOS):结构化文献综述及医生见解
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016;10(3):363-71. doi: 10.1586/17476348.2016.1144476. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
3
Guidelines for diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Joint ICS/NCCP (I) recommendations.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断与管理指南:国际抗痨和肺部疾病联盟/菲律宾国家心肺血液研究所联合(I)建议
Lung India. 2013 Jul;30(3):228-67. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.116248.
4
Therapeutic options for severe asthma.严重哮喘的治疗选择。
Arch Med Sci. 2012 Sep 8;8(4):589-97. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2012.30280.
5
Evolution of asthma concept and effect of current asthma management guidelines.哮喘概念的演变和当前哮喘管理指南的影响。
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2010 Jul;2(3):172-6. doi: 10.4168/aair.2010.2.3.172. Epub 2010 May 6.