Suppr超能文献

民间社会——艾滋病毒预防和烟草控制的领导者。

Civil society-a leader in HIV prevention and tobacco control.

作者信息

Malinowska-Sempruch Kasia, Bonnell Roxana, Hoover Jeff

机构信息

International Harm Reduction Development Program (IHRD), Open Society Institute, New York 10019, USA.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006 Nov;25(6):625-32. doi: 10.1080/09595230600944578.

Abstract

Many civil society organisations (CSOs) have been at the forefront of identifying new ideas and implementing innovative models regarding health and health systems around the world. Their activities become highly charged, however, when they engage in advocacy efforts designed to influence change in policies and systems linked with more controversial or complicated public health issues. Policies, laws and regulations regarding illicit drugs and tobacco fall directly into that category. There is no doubt that the use of both kinds of substances can have the same health consequences-including ill health and death-yet they are approached in widely different ways. Smoking is legal to some extent in every country in the world, and is generally considered a matter of personal choice. Many people believe that efforts to limit tobacco use are coercive and impede on individual rights. Those who use illicit drugs such as heroin, meanwhile, are with few exceptions considered social deviants, misfits and lawbreakers. Many CSOs support comprehensive, government-funded prevention strategies coupled with non-punitive, non-judgmental programmes designed to help users change behaviour. Such strategies are designed to reflect and respond to the medically addictive nature of both tobacco and many illegal drugs. Proponents argue that not only are the public health benefits of expansive, well-conceived interventions potentially vast, but so too are the social and economic benefits accruing from lower rates of debilitating disease and premature death. To that end, many international, national and local CSOs are identifying the direct and indirect health consequences of tobacco and illegal drug use; proposing and advocating for strategies to limit their impact; and sharing information and resources with like-minded organisations elsewhere. This leadership role has helped influence and shape policy, especially in recent years. This paper examines civil society's involvement in efforts to change drug and tobacco policy in selected countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union (CEE/FSU). It concludes that in Poland and Kazakhstan, in terms of tobacco control, and increasingly in Ukraine and parts of Central Asia in terms of harm reduction, multi-sectoral approaches are the most effective way to engage citizens and to implement comprehensive strategies to change behaviour by supportive measures, not punitive ones.

摘要

许多民间社会组织(CSO)一直站在识别新想法和在全球范围内实施有关健康及卫生系统的创新模式的前沿。然而,当它们参与旨在影响与更具争议性或复杂性的公共卫生问题相关的政策和系统变革的宣传活动时,其活动就会变得高度紧张。关于非法药物和烟草的政策、法律和法规就直接属于这一类别。毫无疑问,这两类物质的使用都会产生相同的健康后果,包括健康不佳和死亡,但人们对它们的处理方式却大相径庭。吸烟在世界上每个国家都在某种程度上是合法的,并且通常被视为个人选择的问题。许多人认为限制烟草使用的努力具有强制性,侵犯了个人权利。与此同时,那些使用海洛因等非法药物的人,几乎无一例外都被视为社会偏差者、不合群者和违法者。许多民间社会组织支持由政府资助的全面预防战略,以及旨在帮助使用者改变行为的非惩罚性、非评判性项目。这些战略旨在反映并应对烟草和许多非法药物在医学上的成瘾性。支持者认为,不仅广泛且构思周全的干预措施在公共卫生方面的益处可能是巨大的,而且因使人衰弱的疾病和过早死亡发生率降低而产生的社会和经济效益也是如此。为此,许多国际、国家和地方民间社会组织正在确定烟草和非法药物使用的直接和间接健康后果;提出并倡导限制其影响的战略;并与其他志同道合的组织分享信息和资源。这种领导作用尤其在近年来有助于影响和塑造政策。本文考察了民间社会在中欧和东欧及前苏联(CEE/FSU)部分国家改变毒品和烟草政策的努力中的参与情况。研究得出结论,在波兰和哈萨克斯坦,就烟草控制而言,以及在乌克兰和中亚部分地区,就减少危害而言,多部门方法是让公民参与并通过支持性措施而非惩罚性措施实施全面战略以改变行为的最有效方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验