Vuddhakul Varaporn, Soboon Supatinee, Sunghiran Wattanee, Kaewpiboon Sukhon, Chowdhury Ashrafuzzaman, Ishibashi Masanori, Nakaguchi Yoshitsugu, Nishibuchi Mitsuaki
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.
J Food Prot. 2006 Nov;69(11):2615-20. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.11.2615.
Distribution of pandemic strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood, particularly in molluscan shellfish, and their serological and molecular relationships to clinical strains were examined from Hat Yai City in southern Thailand. During 2000 to 2002, virulent strains (tdh+ or trh+) were isolated from 13 of 230 molluscan shellfish samples using alkaline peptone water enrichment followed by immunomagnetic separation. The isolates included 12 pandemic strains (tdh+, trh-, group-specific PCR positive) from five Oriental hard clam samples, five green mussel samples, and one bloody clam sample. Among the pandemic strains, eight belonged to serogroup O3:K6, three belonged to O1:K25, and one was O1:K untypeable. One hundred eighty-seven strains of V. parahaemolyticus were isolated from clinical specimens obtained from a hospital in this city during 2000 to 2001. The pandemic strains comprised 64 and 68% of the isolates in 2000 and 2001, respectively. Among the serotypes of the pandemic strains, O3:K6 was dominant at 73% in 2000 and 76% in 2001 followed by O1:K25 at 20% in 2000 and 13% in 2001. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles of the pandemic strains from molluscan shellfish were indistinguishable or very similar to those of patient isolates. Similarity of the serotype distribution and DNA fingerprints occurring between the molluscan shellfish strains and clinical strains suggests that molluscan shellfish may be an important source of pandemic V. parahaemolyticus infection in southern Thailand. For public health, proper cooking of molluscan shellfish in this area is strongly recommended.
对泰国南部合艾市海产品,尤其是软体贝类中副溶血性弧菌大流行菌株的分布情况,以及它们与临床菌株之间的血清学和分子关系进行了研究。在2000年至2002年期间,采用碱性蛋白胨水增菌培养,随后进行免疫磁珠分离,从230份软体贝类样本中的13份中分离出了强毒株(tdh+或trh+)。分离出的菌株包括来自5份东方硬蛤样本、5份翡翠贻贝样本和1份泥蚶样本的12株大流行菌株(tdh+、trh-、群特异性PCR阳性)。在这些大流行菌株中,8株属于O3:K6血清群,3株属于O1:K25,1株O1:K无法分型。2000年至2001年期间,从该市一家医院获取的临床标本中分离出187株副溶血性弧菌。大流行菌株分别占2000年和2001年分离株的64%和68%。在大流行菌株的血清型中,O3:K6占主导地位,2000年为73%,2001年为76%,其次是O1:K25,2000年为20%,2001年为13%。来自软体贝类的大流行菌株的脉冲场凝胶电泳图谱与患者分离株的图谱无法区分或非常相似。软体贝类菌株和临床菌株之间血清型分布和DNA指纹图谱的相似性表明,软体贝类可能是泰国南部副溶血性弧菌大流行感染的重要来源。为了公共卫生,强烈建议对该地区的软体贝类进行适当烹饪。