Suppr超能文献

纠正肥胖所致死亡率估计中的偏差。

Correcting biases in estimates of mortality attributable to obesity.

作者信息

Greenberg James A

机构信息

Department of Health and Nutrition Sciences, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, 2900 Bedford Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11210, USA.

出版信息

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Nov;14(11):2071-9. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.242.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether a recent study that found a relatively small number of excess deaths attributable to obesity may have underestimated by not correcting for statistical biases.

RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES

This prospective cohort study used data from the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-Up Study. Survival analyses were conducted using 9690 individuals 32 to 87 years of age and 1886 all-cause deaths during a 9.1-year follow-up. Corrections were made for the reputed regression-dilution bias by using the average BMI during the decade before follow-up as predictor. Corrections for the reputed reverse-causation bias were made by excluding participants with a history of serious illness. Attributable fractions were calculated and used to estimate excess deaths.

RESULTS

The uncorrected estimate of excess deaths attributable to obesity (BMI > or =30) was 41.9, using 18.5 to 25 kg/m(2) as ideal-weight category. Using average BMI as predictor increased the estimate to 93.3. Correcting for reverse-causation effects increased the estimate further to 131.1 (range, 93.3 to 169.0). The uncorrected hazard ratio, 1.25, was increased to 1.41 by using average BMI as predictor, and then to 2.40 by correcting for reverse causation. Using BMI 21 to 25 kg/m(2) and 23 to 25 kg/m(2) as ideal-weight categories increased the corrected estimates to 144.6 (range, 80.5 to 177.2) and 164.1 (range, 103.8 to 194.9), respectively. Larger increases were found for overweight and Grade 2 to 4 obesity (BMI > or =35 kg/m(2)). For overweight, the uncorrected estimate using 18.5 to 25 kg/m(2) as ideal-weight category was -88.3 and the corrected estimate using 23 to 25 kg/m(2) as ideal-weight category was 205.4 (range, 114.5 to 296.3).

DISCUSSION

Correcting for statistical biases and using higher ideal-weight categories increased the estimate of excess deaths attributable to obesity by approximately 400% and changed the negative estimate for overweight to a large positive estimate.

摘要

目的

评估最近一项研究,该研究发现归因于肥胖的额外死亡人数相对较少,是否由于未校正统计偏差而低估了相关数据。

研究方法与步骤

这项前瞻性队列研究使用了首次全国健康与营养检查调查流行病学随访研究的数据。对9690名年龄在32至87岁之间的个体进行了生存分析,在9.1年的随访期间共有1886例全因死亡。通过将随访前十年的平均体重指数(BMI)用作预测指标,对所谓的回归稀释偏差进行校正。通过排除有严重疾病史的参与者,对所谓的反向因果偏差进行校正。计算归因分数并用于估计额外死亡人数。

结果

以18.5至25kg/m²作为理想体重类别,未校正的归因于肥胖(BMI≥30)的额外死亡估计数为41.9。使用平均BMI作为预测指标后,估计数增至93.3。校正反向因果效应后,估计数进一步增至131.1(范围为93.3至169.0)。未校正的风险比为1.25,使用平均BMI作为预测指标后增至1.41,校正反向因果关系后增至2.40。以21至25kg/m²和23至25kg/m²作为理想体重类别,校正后的估计数分别增至144.6(范围为80.5至177.2)和164.1(范围为103.8至194.9)。超重以及2至4级肥胖(BMI≥35kg/m²)的增幅更大。对于超重,以18.5至25kg/m²作为理想体重类别时,未校正的估计数为-88.3,以23至25kg/m²作为理想体重类别时,校正后的估计数为205.4(范围为114.5至296.3)。

讨论

校正统计偏差并使用更高的理想体重类别后,归因于肥胖的额外死亡估计数增加了约400%,并将超重的负估计数变为大幅正估计数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验