Hansen Richard A, Schommer Jon C, Cline Richard R, Hadsall Ronald S, Schondelmeyer Stephen W, Nyman John A
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Division of Pharmaceutical Policy & Evaluative Sciences, CB 7360, Room 205M, Beard Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2005 Jun;1(2):139-57. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2005.03.002.
Previous research on the impact of various cost-sharing strategies on prescription drug use has not considered the impact of direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising.
To explore the association of cost-containment strategies with prescription drug use and to determine if the association is moderated by DTC prescription drug advertising.
The study population included 288 280 employees and dependents aged 18 to 65 years with employer-sponsored health insurance contributing to the MEDSTAT MarketScan administrative data set. Person-level enrollment and claims data were obtained for beneficiaries enrolled continuously during July 1997 through December 1998. Direct-to-consumer advertising data were obtained from Competitive Media Reporting and linked to the MEDSTAT enrollment files. Localized DTC advertising expenditures for one class of medication were evaluated and matched with prescription claims for eligible MEDSTAT contributors. The association of various types and levels of cost-sharing incentives with incident product use was evaluated, controlling for the level of DTC advertising, health status, and other demographic covariates.
The relationship of cost-sharing amounts with drug use was modified by the level of DTC advertising in a geographic market. This relationship was dependent on the type of cost-sharing, distinguishing between co-payments for provider visits and co-payments for prescription drugs. Compared with low-advertising markets, individuals residing in markets with high levels of advertising and paying provider co-payments of $10.00 or more were more likely to use the advertised product. In the same markets, higher prescription drug co-payments were associated with a decreased likelihood of using the advertised product. A similar relationship was not observed for the nonadvertised competitor.
Among insured individuals, response to cost-sharing strategies is moderated by DTC prescription drug advertising. The relative ability of cost-sharing strategies to influence drug use should be interpreted with caution in the presence of DTC advertising.
先前关于各种成本分摊策略对处方药使用影响的研究未考虑直接面向消费者(DTC)广告的影响。
探讨成本控制策略与处方药使用之间的关联,并确定这种关联是否受DTC处方药广告的调节。
研究人群包括288280名年龄在18至65岁之间、由雇主提供医疗保险的员工及其家属,这些数据纳入了MEDSTAT市场扫描管理数据集。获取了1997年7月至1998年12月期间持续参保受益人的个人层面参保和理赔数据。DTC广告数据来自竞争媒体报道,并与MEDSTAT参保文件相关联。评估了一类药物的本地化DTC广告支出,并将其与符合条件的MEDSTAT参保者的处方药理赔进行匹配。在控制DTC广告水平、健康状况和其他人口统计学协变量的情况下,评估了各种类型和水平的成本分摊激励措施与药品使用之间的关联。
地理市场中DTC广告水平改变了成本分摊金额与药品使用之间的关系。这种关系取决于成本分摊的类型,区分就诊自付费用和处方药自付费用。与低广告市场相比,居住在高广告水平市场且支付10美元或更多就诊自付费用的个人更有可能使用广告产品。在相同市场中,较高的处方药自付费用与使用广告产品的可能性降低相关。对于未做广告的竞争产品,未观察到类似关系。
在参保人群中,DTC处方药广告调节了对成本分摊策略的反应。在存在DTC广告的情况下,应谨慎解释成本分摊策略影响药物使用的相对能力。