Hureau Jacques
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2006 Mar;190(3):725-41; discussion 741-6.
Harmonisation of personal injury compensation in the European Union (EU) is crucial. Continuing on from the work begun by the European Federation of Medical Academies, a working party of the XVth Committee of the French National Academy of Medicine has sought to go beyond the restrictive framework of automobile accident compensation in order to address more universal concerns, regardless of the causes and effects of bodily injury. The specific situation of injuries resulting from medical acts was considered, both for its medicolegal complexity and its potential human consequences. After recalling relevant European legislation, the authors consider the different philosophies of medical liability and health care systems in Europe. Methodological convergence is required to achieve harmonisation of personal injury compensation regimes, and especially for the classification of different types of bodily injury, the role of social services, and the establishment of a reference for medical evaluation of injury with built-in compensation levels. The doctrines and concepts of all EU member states (civil law, common law, Nordic medical liability regimes, etc.) are discussed, together with means of facilitating their harmonisation.
欧盟个人伤害赔偿的协调至关重要。在欧洲医学科学院联合会开展的工作基础上继续推进,法国国家医学科学院第十五委员会的一个工作小组试图超越汽车事故赔偿的限制性框架,以解决更普遍的问题,而不论身体伤害的原因和后果如何。考虑到医疗行为导致的伤害的特殊情况,包括其法医学复杂性及其潜在的人类后果。在回顾了相关欧洲立法后,作者们审视了欧洲医疗责任和医疗保健系统的不同理念。需要方法上的趋同来实现个人伤害赔偿制度的协调,特别是在不同类型身体伤害的分类、社会服务的作用以及建立具有内置赔偿水平的伤害医学评估参考标准方面。讨论了所有欧盟成员国的学说和概念(民法、普通法、北欧医疗责任制度等)以及促进它们协调的方法。