Suppr超能文献

等渗与低渗对比剂对低风险患者的肾毒性相当。

Nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast media is equal in low risk patients.

作者信息

Feldkamp T, Baumgart D, Elsner M, Herget-Rosenthal S, Pietruck F, Erbel R, Philipp T, Kribben A

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Nephrol. 2006 Nov;66(5):322-30. doi: 10.5414/cnp66322.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contrast media-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an increasing cause of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury and leads to a significant increase in mortality. There is uncertainty whether the use of iso-osmolar contrast media as opposed to the use of low-osmolar contrast media would be associated with a lower incidence of CIN. Therefore, we compared the nephrotoxicity of isoosmotic contrast media iodixanol with the low-osmotic contrast media iopromid in patients receiving contrast media during coronary angiography.

METHODS

In this prospective double-blind study we examined 221 patients with normal renal function who received up to 1,000 ml of contrast media during coronary angiography, and compared the effect of iodixanol and iopromid on inducing contrast media nephropathy. Patients received 800 ml fluid orally before contrast media administration and 1,000 ml saline i.v. thereafter. Creatinine clearance, serum creatinine and urine-N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) concentration was obtained 24 h before and 48 h after contrast media administration. Decrease of 20% of the creatinine clearance, increase of 25% of serum creatinine and increase of 20% of the urine concentration of NAG was defined as CIN.

RESULTS

Incidence of CIN assessed by decreased creatinine clearance was 22.2% in the iopromid group and 19.7% in the iodixanol group. CIN defined by increased serum creatinine was 6.9% in the iopromid group and 8.6% in the iodixanol group. The difference between these two groups was not significant. Subgroup analysis of the diabetic patients or the patients that received high dose of contrast media revealed no significant difference in the incidence of CIN between the two contrast media.

CONCLUSION

The iso-osmolar and the low-osmolar contrast media exhibited the same incidence of CIN in our study population. If fluid administration is sufficient, the selection of either iopromid or iodixanol has no impact on the risk of developing CIN in patients with normal renal function, even when they are diabetic or receive a high dose of more than 500 ml contrast media.

摘要

背景

造影剂肾病(CIN)是医院获得性急性肾损伤日益常见的病因,且会导致死亡率显著上升。与使用低渗造影剂相比,使用等渗造影剂是否会使CIN的发生率更低尚不确定。因此,我们比较了等渗造影剂碘克沙醇与低渗造影剂碘普罗胺在接受冠状动脉造影并使用造影剂的患者中的肾毒性。

方法

在这项前瞻性双盲研究中,我们检查了221例肾功能正常且在冠状动脉造影期间接受最多1000毫升造影剂的患者,并比较了碘克沙醇和碘普罗胺对诱发造影剂肾病的影响。患者在造影剂给药前口服800毫升液体,之后静脉输注1000毫升生理盐水。在造影剂给药前24小时和给药后48小时测定肌酐清除率、血清肌酐和尿N-乙酰-β-D-氨基葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)浓度。肌酐清除率降低20%、血清肌酐升高25%以及尿NAG浓度升高20%被定义为CIN。

结果

通过肌酐清除率降低评估的碘普罗胺组CIN发生率为22.2%,碘克沙醇组为19.7%。由血清肌酐升高定义的CIN在碘普罗胺组为6.9%,在碘克沙醇组为8.6%。两组之间的差异不显著。糖尿病患者或接受高剂量造影剂患者的亚组分析显示,两种造影剂之间CIN发生率无显著差异。

结论

在我们的研究人群中,等渗和低渗造影剂的CIN发生率相同。如果液体输注充足,对于肾功能正常的患者,即使是糖尿病患者或接受超过500毫升的高剂量造影剂,选择碘普罗胺或碘克沙醇对发生CIN的风险均无影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验