Mizu-uchi Hideki, Matsuda Shuichi, Miura Hiromasa, Higaki Hidehiko, Okazaki Ken, Iwamoto Yukihide
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka City, 812-8582, Japan.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Dec;88(12):2632-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01288.
Extramedullary alignment guides are commonly used to prepare the tibia during total knee arthroplasty. One disadvantage is that the guide is easily affected by the position of the ankle joint. The tibia may have a rotational mismatch between its proximal and distal ends. We hypothesized that a rotational mismatch might cause incorrect positioning of an extramedullary alignment guide and evaluated such a mismatch on the predicted postoperative coronal alignment of the tibia.
Fifty-three osteoarthritic knees with varus deformity in fifty-one patients were evaluated with use of computerized tomography scans before total knee arthroplasty. We defined one anteroposterior axis of the ankle joint and five different anteroposterior axes of the proximal aspect of the tibia using three-dimensional bone models from the computerized tomography data. We measured the rotational angle between the anteroposterior axis of the ankle joint and the proximal part of the tibia. The distal end of the extramedullary guide was placed in front of the center of the ankle joint (on the line of the extended anteroposterior axis of the ankle joint), and the proximal end was placed on the line of the extended anteroposterior axis of the proximal part of the tibia. We established spatial coordinates to evaluate the effect of the rotational angle on the predicted postoperative coronal alignment of the tibia and calculated the presumed tibial coronal alignment.
The rotational angle was positive (3.6 degrees to 19.7 degrees) for all of the anteroposterior axes of the proximal aspect of the tibia, indicating that the ankle joint was externally rotated relative to the proximal part of the tibia. The predicted tibial coronal alignment was varus (0.5 degrees to 5.1 degrees) for all of the anteroposterior axes of the proximal part of the tibia.
When an extramedullary alignment guide is used to prepare the tibia in total knee arthroplasty, varus alignment of the tibial component can occur because of a rotational mismatch between the proximal part of the tibia and the ankle joint.
在全膝关节置换术中,髓外定位导板常用于胫骨准备。一个缺点是该导板容易受到踝关节位置的影响。胫骨近端和远端之间可能存在旋转不匹配。我们假设旋转不匹配可能导致髓外定位导板定位错误,并评估这种不匹配对胫骨术后冠状面定位的影响。
在全膝关节置换术前,对51例患者的53个患有内翻畸形的骨关节炎膝关节进行计算机断层扫描评估。我们使用计算机断层扫描数据中的三维骨模型定义了一个踝关节前后轴和胫骨近端的五个不同前后轴。我们测量了踝关节前后轴与胫骨近端之间的旋转角度。髓外导板的远端置于踝关节中心前方(在踝关节前后延长线上),近端置于胫骨近端前后延长线上。我们建立空间坐标以评估旋转角度对胫骨术后冠状面定位预测的影响,并计算假定的胫骨冠状面定位。
胫骨近端所有前后轴的旋转角度均为正值(3.6度至19.7度),表明踝关节相对于胫骨近端向外旋转。胫骨近端所有前后轴的预测胫骨冠状面定位均为内翻(0.5度至5.1度)。
在全膝关节置换术中使用髓外定位导板准备胫骨时,由于胫骨近端与踝关节之间的旋转不匹配,可能会出现胫骨组件的内翻定位。