Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi Red Cross Hospital, Yamaguchi City, Yamaguchi, Japan.
J Knee Surg. 2022 Oct;35(12):1273-1279. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722660. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
The optimal placement within 3 degrees in coronal alignment was reportedly achieved in only 60 to 80% of patients when using an extramedullary alignment guide for the tibial side in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This probably occurs because the extramedullary alignment guide is easily affected by the position of the ankle joint which is difficult to define by tibial torsion. Rotational direction of distal end of the extramedullary guide should be aligned to the anteroposterior (AP) axis of the proximal tibia to acquire optimal coronal alignment in the computer simulation studies; however, its efficacy has not been proven in a clinical setting. The distal end of the guide can be overly displaced from the ideal position when using a conventional guide system despite the alignment of the AP axis to the proximal tibia. This study investigated the effect of displacement of the distal end of extramedullary guide relative to the tibial coronal alignment while adjusting the rotational alignment of the distal end to the AP axis of the proximal tibia in TKA. A total of 50 TKAs performed in 50 varus osteoarthritic knees using an image-free navigation system were included in this study. The rotational alignment of the proximal side of the guide was adjusted to the AP axis of the proximal tibia. The position of the distal end of the guide was aligned to the center of the ankle joint as viewed from the proximal AP axis (ideal position) and as determined by the navigation system. The tibial intraoperative coronal alignments were recorded as the distal end was moved from the ideal position at 3-mm intervals. The intraoperative alignments were 0.5, 0.9, and 1.4 degrees in valgus alignment with 3-, 6-, and 9-mm medial displacements, respectively. The intraoperative alignments were 0.7, 1.2, and 1.7 degrees in varus alignment with 3-, 6-, and 9-mm lateral displacements, respectively. In conclusion, the acceptable tibial coronal alignment (within 2 degrees from the optimal alignment) can be achieved, although some displacement of the distal end from the ideal position can occur after the rotational alignment of the distal end of the guide is adjusted to the AP axis of the proximal tibia.
据报道,在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中使用髓外胫骨侧定位导向器时,只有 60%到 80%的患者能够达到冠状面 3 度以内的理想位置。这可能是因为髓外定位导向器很容易受到踝关节位置的影响,而踝关节的位置很难通过胫骨扭转来确定。在计算机模拟研究中,为了获得最佳的冠状面对线,远端的髓外导向器的旋转方向应与胫骨近端的前后(AP)轴对齐;然而,其在临床环境中的效果尚未得到证实。尽管 AP 轴与胫骨近端对齐,但在使用传统导向系统时,导向器的远端可能会过度偏离理想位置。本研究调查了 TKA 中调整远端旋转对线以匹配胫骨近端 AP 轴时,远端相对于胫骨冠状对线的位置偏移对髓外导向器的影响。本研究共纳入 50 例使用无图像导航系统的 50 例内翻型骨关节炎膝关节的 TKA 患者。调整导向器近端的旋转对线以匹配胫骨近端的 AP 轴。从近端 AP 轴观察到的踝关节中心(理想位置)和导航系统确定的位置来调整导向器远端的位置。当远端从理想位置以 3mm 的间隔移动时,记录胫骨术中冠状对线。术中对线在 3mm 内侧偏移时分别为 0.5°、0.9°和 1.4°的外翻对线,6mm 内侧偏移时分别为 0.7°、1.2°和 1.7°的内翻对线,9mm 内侧偏移时分别为 0.7°、1.2°和 1.7°的内翻对线。结论:虽然在调整导向器远端的旋转对线以匹配胫骨近端 AP 轴后,远端可能会从理想位置发生一些位移,但仍可获得可接受的胫骨冠状对线(与最佳对线相差 2 度以内)。