Selden Thomas M
Division of Modeling and Simulation, Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Rd, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):e1766-78. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0286.
This study examines national compliance rates with well-child visit recommendations using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey provides nationally representative information on preventative care for children, combining visit-level data over a 2-year period with a rich array of socioeconomic and health status measures.
Visit-level data from 2000 to 2002 were used to construct a well-child visit "compliance" measure equal to well-child visits as a percentage of age-specific recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics. Compliance was examined across age, gender, race/ethnicity, health status, poverty, insurance coverage, eligibility for public coverage, family structure, parent education, insurance, citizenship and country of origin, language, urbanicity, and census division.
On average, 56.3% of all children aged 0 to 18 years had no well-child visits during a 12-month period, and 39.4% had no well-child visits over a 2-year period. The average compliance ratio was 61.4%. Large differences in compliance exist among children. High compliance rates were observed among infants (83.2%), children with special health care needs (86.6%), children with college-educated parents (74.3%), children with family incomes >4 times the poverty level (71.6%), and children in the New England (94.6%) and Middle Atlantic (83.2%) census divisions. Low levels of compliance were observed among uninsured children (35.3%) and especially uninsured children simulated to be eligible for public coverage (28.4%). Other groups with low compliance rates include teenagers (49.2%), noncitizen children (43.9%), and children in the West South Central (44.9%), East South Central (48.8%), and Mountain (49.7%) census divisions.
Well-child visit compliance in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey is less than found in other household surveys, yet consistent with or above results based on data from provider and claims data. Although experts dispute the optimal frequency of well-child visits, the disparities observed in compliance rates among population subgroups raise important public health concerns.
本研究使用医疗支出面板调查来考察全国儿童健康检查建议的依从率。医疗支出面板调查提供了关于儿童预防性保健的全国代表性信息,它将两年期间的就诊层面数据与一系列丰富的社会经济和健康状况指标相结合。
利用2000年至2002年的就诊层面数据构建一项儿童健康检查“依从性”指标,该指标等于儿童健康检查次数占美国儿科学会特定年龄建议次数的百分比。对不同年龄、性别、种族/族裔、健康状况、贫困程度、保险覆盖情况、公共保险资格、家庭结构、父母教育程度、保险类型、公民身份和原籍国、语言、城市化程度以及人口普查分区的依从性进行了考察。
平均而言,在12个月期间,所有0至18岁儿童中有56.3%未进行儿童健康检查,在两年期间有39.4%未进行儿童健康检查。平均依从率为61.4%。儿童之间的依从性存在很大差异。在婴儿(83.2%)、有特殊医疗需求的儿童(86.6%)、父母受过大学教育的儿童(74.3%)、家庭收入超过贫困线4倍的儿童(71.6%)以及新英格兰(94.6%)和中大西洋(83.2%)人口普查分区的儿童中观察到高依从率。在未参保儿童(35.3%)中,尤其是模拟有资格获得公共保险的未参保儿童(28.4%)中观察到低依从性水平。其他依从率较低的群体包括青少年(49.2%)、非公民儿童(43.9%)以及西中南部(44.9%)、东中南部(48.8%)和山区(49.7%)人口普查分区的儿童。
医疗支出面板调查中的儿童健康检查依从率低于其他家庭调查中的发现,但与基于医疗服务提供者和理赔数据得出的结果一致或更高。尽管专家们对儿童健康检查的最佳频率存在争议,但在不同人群亚组中观察到的依从率差异引发了重要的公共卫生问题。