Brebner N S, Moens N M M, Runciman J R
Department of Clinical Studies, University of Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2006;19(4):205-12.
The objective was to compare mean peak vertical force (PVF) obtained with a treadmill with two integrated force plates (TM) with the piezoelectric force platform (FP) for sound and lame dogs at a trot. The aim was also to report the inter-step variability (ISV) for both systems and the effect of lameness on these values. Six sound dogs (20.0-25.5 kg) and six dogs with a grade 2/5 forelimb lameness (17.0-36.1 kg) were used in the study. Dogs were acclimatized and assigned an individual target velocity (1.8-2.2 m/s). Mean PVF measurements were obtained for both TM and FP. Subject velocity was controlled by belt speed on TM and restricted to 0.25 M/s above or below the assigned target velocity for FP. Acceleration was limited to +/- 0.3 M/s2. For the sound dogs, concordance and correlation coefficients of the mean PVF for the front limbs was 0.79 and 0.76, respectively. Concordance and correlation for the rear limbs was 0.90 and 0.81, respectively. For the lame dogs, concordance and correlation for the front limbs was 0.73 and 0.59, respectively. Concordance and correlation for the rear limbs was 0.89 and 0.95, respectively. ISV was 0.94 with TM and 0.84 with FP for the sound dogs and 0.96 with TM and 0.87 with FP for the lame dogs. In conclusion, TM provided rapid PVF measurements, good concordance for the hind limbs, and substantial concordance for the forelimbs in both sound and lame dogs at a trot as compared to FP. Both systems demonstrated excellent ISV for both lame and sound dogs.
目的是比较在小跑时,使用带有两个集成测力板的跑步机(TM)与压电式测力平台(FP)测量健全犬和跛行犬的平均垂直峰值力(PVF)。同时还要报告两个系统的步间变异性(ISV)以及跛行对这些值的影响。本研究使用了6只健全犬(体重20.0 - 25.5千克)和6只前肢跛行程度为2/5级的犬(体重17.0 - 36.1千克)。使犬适应环境并为其设定个体目标速度(1.8 - 2.2米/秒)。分别通过TM和FP获取平均PVF测量值。TM上的受试者速度由皮带速度控制,对于FP,速度限制在指定目标速度上下0.25米/秒范围内。加速度限制在±0.3米/秒²。对于健全犬,前肢平均PVF的一致性系数和相关系数分别为0.79和0.76。后肢的一致性系数和相关系数分别为0.90和0.81。对于跛行犬,前肢的一致性系数和相关系数分别为0.73和0.59。后肢的一致性系数和相关系数分别为0.89和0.95。健全犬使用TM时ISV为0.94,使用FP时为0.84;跛行犬使用TM时ISV为0.96,使用FP时为0.87。总之,与FP相比,在小跑时,TM为健全犬和跛行犬提供了快速的PVF测量值,后肢一致性良好,前肢也有较高的一致性。两个系统在跛行犬和健全犬中均表现出出色的ISV。